[R-sig-Fedora] Installing texlive dependencies
R P Herrold
herrold at owlriver.com
Wed Apr 18 20:02:52 CEST 2012
On Wed, 18 Apr 2012, Petar Milin wrote:
> Hello ALL!
> I am running Fedora 16 x86_64. Due to some dubious problems, that i
> couldn't resolve, with the TeXLive (2007, which is a default), I removed
> it.
ughhh ---- filing a bug with Fedora would be useful as well,
so they could address any systemic issues that may exist
(we'll look into this later in this email)
> That removed R as well, and some other dependent packages.
Sadly, implying that 'yum' was used for the removal ... that
tool is wayyy' too enthusiastic at removing packages;
rpm -e ...
is more of a scalpel
> Then, I
> installed TeXLive 2011 from CTAN. However, when I wanted to install R,
> from Fedora's repositories, it asks for some TeX dependencies (for
> example, tex-preview, texinfo-tex, texlive, texlive-dvips etc.).
Ley me try: on a fresh install of Fedora 16 (64 bit), I ran:
[root at vm049244226 ~]# yum install R
... which wanted much TeX goodness ...
texlive x86_64 2007-66.fc16 updates 1.6 M
texlive-dvips x86_64 2007-66.fc16 updates 192 k
texlive-latex x86_64 2007-66.fc16 updates 84 k
texlive-texmf noarch 2007-40.fc16 updates 2.8 M
texlive-texmf-dvips noarch 2007-40.fc16 updates 238 k
texlive-texmf-fonts noarch 2007-40.fc16 updates 48 M
texlive-texmf-latex noarch 2007-40.fc16 updates 5.2 M
texlive-utils x86_64 2007-66.fc16 updates 251 k
...
and R seems to work here:
[root at vm049244226 ~]# cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 16 (Verne)
[root at vm049244226 ~]# R
R version 2.15.0 (2012-03-30)
Copyright (C) 2012 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
ISBN 3-900051-07-0
Platform: x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu (64-bit)
R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
You are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions.
Type 'license()' or 'licence()' for distribution details.
Natural language support but running in an English locale
R is a collaborative project with many contributors.
Type 'contributors()' for more information and
'citation()' on how to cite R or R packages in publications.
Type 'demo()' for some demos, 'help()' for on-line help, or
'help.start()' for an HTML browser interface to help.
Type 'q()' to quit R.
> example(t.test)
t.test> require(graphics)
t.test> t.test(1:10,y=c(7:20)) # P = .00001855
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: 1:10 and c(7:20)
t = -5.4349, df = 21.982, p-value = 1.855e-05
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal
to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-11.052802 -4.947198
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
5.5 13.5
t.test> t.test(1:10,y=c(7:20, 200)) # P = .1245 -- NOT
significant anymore
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: 1:10 and c(7:20, 200)
t = -1.6329, df = 14.165, p-value = 0.1245
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal
to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-47.242900 6.376233
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
5.50000 25.93333
t.test> ## Classical example: Student's sleep data
t.test> plot(extra ~ group, data = sleep)
t.test> ## Traditional interface
t.test> with(sleep, t.test(extra[group == 1], extra[group ==
2]))
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: extra[group == 1] and extra[group == 2]
t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal
to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-3.3654832 0.2054832
sample estimates:
mean of x mean of y
0.75 2.33
t.test> ## Formula interface
t.test> t.test(extra ~ group, data = sleep)
Welch Two Sample t-test
data: extra by group
t = -1.8608, df = 17.776, p-value = 0.07939
alternative hypothesis: true difference in means is not equal
to 0
95 percent confidence interval:
-3.3654832 0.2054832
sample estimates:
mean in group 1 mean in group 2
0.75 2.33
> q()
Save workspace image? [y/n/c]: n
[root at vm049244226 ~]#
... so it _can_ work under Fedora 16 ...
> I know that new TeX is installed in other place
> (/usr/local/texlive/2011/), than the old, default of the Tex 2007
> (/usr/share/texmf/). But, I defined PATH properly:
> PATH=/usr/local/texlive/2011/bin/x86-64-linux:$PATH
> Also, I have tried with the symbolic link:
> ln -s /usr/local/texlive/2011 /usr/share/texmf
>
> So, I wonder why R asks for those TeX-packages? Can I tell it where to
> look? In any case, how to fix this mess?
The packaging decisions behind R included support for the
ability to generate postscript, and documentation; that
dragged in all the TeX, in part
A clean install of Fedora comes to mind, because mixing
packaging systems is inherently 'pot luck' and random in
nature, just as mixing tarball hand-compiled matter into a
package managed system rarely works well
sorry to bear that news ;(
-- Russ herrold
More information about the R-SIG-Fedora
mailing list