[R-sig-Debian] r-cran-rgdal: dependency on libgdal1 unsatisfied in ubuntu 12.04?
Dirk Eddelbuettel
edd at debian.org
Sat Sep 27 22:14:46 CEST 2014
On 27 September 2014 at 21:04, Matt Dowle wrote:
| On 27/09/14 20:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| The fear may be that a fresh install will be needed (a pain) as
But Matt, I never said or implied "fresh install". My exact words, from two
emails ago:
"I would upgrade, which I do every six months."
Upgrade, not "reinstall".
| might not work. That's why I switched to a rolling release (LMDE) so
Rolling releases rock. Debian pretty much invented this with "testing" which
is a rolling release receiving packages from the top (aka "unstable") if
(approximatly) no new upload was made, no critical bugs appeared and it is
not blocking another packages dependency graph. So in essence "always ten
days fresh" (as eg for my R builds). That rocks, and it is getting more
recognition now.
| I'll never need to upgrade and reinstall and setup all the software I
| need and config again. So they tell me. I'll tell you if it's true in
| a few years! My /home is mounted on its own partition, so that's not a
| pain (but is for users who don't know how to use gparted to do that),
| but even then I fear problems if I point a new release to my single
| /home and then need to roll back (the new release may have changed files
| in ~).
| Do you do a fresh install every 6 months or do you upgrade your existing?
For one reason or another the majority of my machines (at home and work) are
actually running Ubuntu.
And I __always__ updated __all of them__ every six months __whenever a new
release comes out__. Some of these may now have had over ten upgrades. No
issues. I tend to do the auxiliary machines at home first, then my main
laptop, then the server and then the machines at work.
It. just. works.
And is the least amount of work as far as I can tell.
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
More information about the R-SIG-Debian
mailing list