[R-pkg-devel] Spelling of PDB in Package Description
Uwe Ligges
||gge@ @end|ng |rom @t@t|@t|k@tu-dortmund@de
Fri Sep 15 00:01:03 CEST 2023
On 14.09.2023 23:35, Leonard Mada wrote:
> Dear Uwe,
>
>
> I found out what is going on. There is an example:
>
> ## Write the pdb object in file "Rpdb.pdb" into the current directory
> write.pdb(pdb, file = "Rpdb.pdb")
>
In examples, you should write to tempdir(), if at all.
Best,
Uwe Ligges
>
> The example was present in the previous version as well. So I did not
> thought about it. I do not know how to handle this: although the example
> should probably remain.
>
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
> Leonard
>
>
> On 9/15/2023 12:27 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>> The spellng is fine and not a problem.
>>
>> For
>> * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ... NOTE
>> Found the following files/directories:
>> ‘Rpdb.pdb’
>> You need to move this to ./inst or a subdirectory or, if data,
>> consider ./extdata See Writing R Extensions.
>>
>> Best,
>> Uwe Ligges
>>
>>
>> On 14.09.2023 22:06, Avraham Adler wrote:
>>> Regarding PDB, in Rd format it’s best to wrap that in an \acronym{}
>>> tag. See section 2.3 of
>>> https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/R-exts.html#Marking-text
>>>
>>> Avi
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>> On Sep 14, 2023, at 3:40 PM, Leonard Mada via R-package-devel
>>>> <r-package-devel using r-project.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear List Members,
>>>>
>>>> After resubmitting the updated version of the Rpdb package (2.3.1),
>>>> the following Notes were generated:
>>>>
>>>> 1.) Spelling PDB
>>>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/Rpdb_2.3.1_20230914_173458/Windows/00check.log
>>>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/Rpdb_2.3.1_20230914_173458/Debian/00check.log
>>>>
>>>> The PDB stands for Protein Data Bank:
>>>> http://www.wwpdb.org/documentation/file-format-content/format33/v3.3.html
>>>>
>>>> It should be the correct spelling (and was the same in the previous
>>>> versions of the package).
>>>>
>>>> 2.) Small Sample PDB Files
>>>> * checking for non-standard things in the check directory ...
>>>> NOTE Found the following files/directories: ‘Rpdb.pdb’
>>>>
>>>> There is a directory with 3 very small sample pdb-files. The
>>>> directory was also present in the previous version.
>>>>
>>>> How should I proceed? Or did I miss something?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Leonard
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list