[R-pkg-devel] nit-picking about CRAN repository policy
Ben Bolker
bbo|ker @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Mon May 9 00:39:58 CEST 2022
On 2022-05-07 6:54 p.m., Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> While I of course do not speak for CRAN, allow me (given I've harped on this
> beat before [1]) to record a strong disagreement here: "unconditionally used"
> is simply not reflecting the conditional nature of a Suggests, nomatter where
> it happens in the package. Vignettes are no different from examples.
>
> So I say thanks to CRAN for having gradually sharpened the language in the
> CRAN Repo Policu over the years and for now adding even more explicit tests.
>
> Dirk
>
> [1] One such post is "Suggests != Depends which is at
> https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2017/03/22/#suggests_is_not_depends
>
Dirk and Simon: to be clear, I'm not objecting to the new tests, just
to the fact that they don't match the published repository policy.
(and conditioned on a mildly annoying CRAN interaction as described
elsewhere in the thread
<https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-package-devel/2022q2/008040.html>).
cheers
Ben
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list