[R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version out of date (?)

[Aisouda Hoshiyar]

* checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
Maintainer: ‘Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshiyar using hsu-hh.de>’

is just a change of the maintainer and already declared in my cran-comments.md file.

Best
Aisouda 



> Am 17.08.2021 um 15:42 schrieb Gábor Csárdi <csardi.gabor using gmail.com>:
> 
> I think they are this:
> 
> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
> ...
> 
> and this:
> 
> * checking examples ... [76s/77s] NOTE
> Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 5s
>                  user system elapsed
> ordPens-package 54.112  0.044  54.158
> ordPCA          18.377  0.004  18.382
> 
> G.
> 
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 3:38 PM Aisouda Hoshiyar
> <aisouda.hoshiyar using hsu-hh.de <mailto:aisouda.hoshiyar using hsu-hh.de>> wrote:
>> 
>> The CRAN (pretest) email states:
>> 
>> package ordPens_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
>> Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>>>
>> Status: 2 NOTEs
>> 
>> Last released version's CRAN status: NOTE: 13
>> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>>
>> 
>> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
>> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all to this message and explain.
>> 
>> I really don’t understand how else to fix (and what to fix). These are out of date problems of version 0.3-1, which are not relevant any more in version 1.0.0
>> Version 1.0.0 exactly was a fix to those.
>> 
>> Do you think I can reply-all & explain that this must be a false-positive?
>> 
>> Best
>> Aisouda
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 17.08.2021 um 15:22 schrieb Georgi Boshnakov <georgi.boshnakov using manchester.ac.uk <mailto:georgi.boshnakov using manchester.ac.uk>>:
>>> 
>>> When the previous version has problems, you get an email listing them, followed with something like 'Did you fix them? Please Reply-All...'
>>> 
>>> Maybe you missed the last phrase?
>>> 
>>> Georgi Boshnakov
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>>
>>> From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org>> on behalf of Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshiyar using hsu-hh.de <mailto:aisouda.hoshiyar using hsu-hh.de>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:59:13 PM
>>> To: r-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel using r-project.org> <r-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:r-package-devel using r-project.org>>
>>> Subject: [R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version out of date (?)
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> submitting an update of our package ordPens failed (update version is 1.0.0), reporting the following:
>>> Version: 1.0.0
>>> ok
>>> Version: 0.3-1
>>> Check: R code for possible problems, Result: NOTE
>>>  genRidge: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
>>>  ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'anova'
>>>  ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'lm'
>>>  ordSelect: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
>>>  ordSmooth: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
>>>  plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'grey'
>>>  plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'devAskNewPage'
>>>  plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'lines'
>>>  predict.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
>>>  Undefined global functions or variables:
>>>    anova devAskNewPage grey lines lm plogis sd
>>>  Consider adding
>>>    importFrom("grDevices", "devAskNewPage", "grey")
>>>    importFrom("graphics", "lines")
>>>    importFrom("stats", "anova", "lm", "plogis", "sd")
>>>  to your NAMESPACE file.
>>> Version: 0.3-1
>>> Check: package dependencies, Result: NOTE
>>>  Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘IsoGene’
>>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>>
>>> 
>>> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/><https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>>>
>>> 
>>> But these are exactly the new changes that we already took care of in the updated version 1.0.0
>>> The previous version 0.3-1 is from 2015 and due to R updates, the old package won’t work any more.
>>> That is exactly the reason for update version 1.0.0, were everything is fixed now.
>>> 
>>> Also,
>>> - there is a NOTE about change in maintainer, which is already stated in the cran-comments.md, and the previous maintainer sent an e-main to CRAN as well
>>> - there is a NOTE saying 'Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s‘
>>> which is also stated in the cran-comments.md explaining that cross-validation examples are important for illustrating the package usage.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So is this a false positive?
>>> 
>>> Best
>>> Aisouda
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>> 
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>>
>> 
>> 
>>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> 
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]