[R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version out of date (?)

[Aisouda Hoshiyar]

The CRAN (pretest) email states:
 
package ordPens_1.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks automatically, please see the following pre-tests: 
Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/00check.log>>
Status: 2 NOTEs

Last released version's CRAN status: NOTE: 13
See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>

Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform. 
If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all to this message and explain.

I really don’t understand how else to fix (and what to fix). These are out of date problems of version 0.3-1, which are not relevant any more in version 1.0.0
Version 1.0.0 exactly was a fix to those. 

Do you think I can reply-all & explain that this must be a false-positive?

Best
Aisouda



> Am 17.08.2021 um 15:22 schrieb Georgi Boshnakov <georgi.boshnakov using manchester.ac.uk>:
> 
> When the previous version has problems, you get an email listing them, followed with something like 'Did you fix them? Please Reply-All...'
> 
> Maybe you missed the last phrase?
> 
> Georgi Boshnakov
> 
> 
> 
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org> on behalf of Aisouda Hoshiyar <aisouda.hoshiyar using hsu-hh.de>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2021 12:59:13 PM
> To: r-package-devel using r-project.org <r-package-devel using r-project.org>
> Subject: [R-pkg-devel] submitting package update failed, since old version out of date (?)
>  
> Hi,
> 
> submitting an update of our package ordPens failed (update version is 1.0.0), reporting the following:
> Version: 1.0.0
> ok
> Version: 0.3-1
> Check: R code for possible problems, Result: NOTE
>   genRidge: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
>   ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'anova'
>   ordGene: no visible global function definition for 'lm'
>   ordSelect: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
>   ordSmooth: no visible binding for global variable 'sd'
>   plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'grey'
>   plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'devAskNewPage'
>   plot.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'lines'
>   predict.ordPen: no visible global function definition for 'plogis'
>   Undefined global functions or variables:
>     anova devAskNewPage grey lines lm plogis sd
>   Consider adding
>     importFrom("grDevices", "devAskNewPage", "grey")
>     importFrom("graphics", "lines")
>     importFrom("stats", "anova", "lm", "plogis", "sd")
>   to your NAMESPACE file.
> Version: 0.3-1
> Check: package dependencies, Result: NOTE
>   Package suggested but not available for checking: ‘IsoGene’
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_ordPens.html>>
> 
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/ <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/ordPens_1.0.0_20210817_114846/Debian/>>
> 
> But these are exactly the new changes that we already took care of in the updated version 1.0.0
> The previous version 0.3-1 is from 2015 and due to R updates, the old package won’t work any more. 
> That is exactly the reason for update version 1.0.0, were everything is fixed now.
> 
> Also,
> - there is a NOTE about change in maintainer, which is already stated in the cran-comments.md, and the previous maintainer sent an e-main to CRAN as well
> - there is a NOTE saying 'Examples with CPU (user + system) or elapsed time > 10s‘
> which is also stated in the cran-comments.md explaining that cross-validation examples are important for illustrating the package usage.
>  
> 
> So is this a false positive? 
> 
> Best
> Aisouda
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>


	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]