[R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server
Martin Morgan
mtmorg@n@b|oc @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue May 18 21:34:07 CEST 2021
It is wrong to say that ‘it will never be solved for R.4.0.0’. Rather, ‘it will never be a problem for R.4.0.0’.
rtracklayer 1.51.5 was only ever built, checked, distributed (and installed in a correctly configured system, using the rules of install.packages and tools:::.BioC_version_associated_with_R_version(), or of BiocManager::install()) on R-devel (now R-4-1-0-branch). So R-4.0.* has never supported version 1.51.5 of rtracklayer.
No Bioconductor package built on R-4.0.* would propagate (be visible to install.packages()) with a dependency on rtracklayer-1.51.5. A CRAN package with a dependency on rtracklayer-1.51.5 (this is hypothetical, I do not believe it is the case for CNVScope), would be correctly flagged as an error – this version of rtracklayer will never be available on R-4.0.*, and the CRAN package author would have to re-assess the reasons for specifying the dependency for that version of R.
Bioconductor does rarely produce ‘impossible’ dependencies particularly in the Bioconductor ‘devel’ branch (when a package builds and checks even though one of its dependencies builds but does not pass check), but these are transient and an artifact of the Bioconductor build system – the lagging package Is usually promptly updated so the published dependency is satisfied.
From: Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson using gmail.com>
Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 at 2:41 PM
To: Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com>
Cc: "Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [F]" <james.dalgleish using nih.gov>, "r-package-devel using r-project.org" <r-package-devel using r-project.org>
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Old version of rtracklayer on a single check server
I stand corrected about the R-devel version (and now R 4.1.0) on CRAN.
However, isn't it the case that it will never be solved for R 4.0.0 (to become R-oldrel on CRAN) and CRAN will keep reporting an error on MS Windows there because https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.12/bioc/html/rtracklayer.html provides only an older version for MS Windows?
If so, an alternative to relying on Suggests is to make the package depend on R (>= 4.1.0).
/Henrik
On Tue, May 18, 2021, 09:08 Martin Morgan <mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com<mailto:mtmorgan.bioc using gmail.com>> wrote:
That’s not correct Henrik.
CRAN follows CRAN rules for installing packages, so uses tools:::BioC_version_for_R_version(). For R-devel we have
> R.version.string
[1] "R Under development (unstable) (2021-05-18 r80323)"
> tools:::.BioC_version_associated_with_R_version()
[1] '3.13'
For this version of Bioconductor, the rtracklayer version (from https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.13/rtracklayer, or `available.packages(repos = "https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.13/bioc")["rtracklayer", "Version"]`) is 1.51.5.
So the r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64 builder mentioned in the post has the wrong version of rtracklayer for R-devel.
Martin Morgan
On 5/18/21, 11:49 AM, "R-package-devel on behalf of Henrik Bengtsson" <r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org<mailto:r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org> on behalf of henrik.bengtsson using gmail.com<mailto:henrik.bengtsson using gmail.com>> wrote:
It's a problem with Bioconductor and a broken release history of
'rtracklayer' on MS Windows (e.g.
https://bioconductor.org/packages/3.12/bioc/html/rtracklayer.html)
plus how each Bioconductor version is tied to a specific R version.
In other words, even if they fix it in Bioconductor 3.13 (for R
4.1.0), it can't be fixed in Bioconductor 3.12 (for R 4.0.0), so
you're package will keep failing on Windows for R 4.0.0. The reason
why it can't be fixed in Bioconductor 3.12 is that they have now
frozen that release forever.
Because of this, I suspect the only solution is to make 'rtracklayer'
an optional package, i.e. move it to Suggests: and update all your
code to run conditionally of that package being available. I recommend
you reach out to the bioc-devel mailing list for advice.
/Henrik
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 4:33 AM Dalgleish, James (NIH/NCI) [F] via
R-package-devel <r-package-devel using r-project.org<mailto:r-package-devel using r-project.org>> wrote:
>
> To any who might have an idea:
>
> I've been reading several posts in the digest about dependency version issues on the check servers and I'm having my own issue, which I can't solve because I can't upgrade the check server's package version:
> * installing *source* package 'CNVScope' ...
> ** using staged installation
> ** R
> ** data
> *** moving datasets to lazyload DB
> ** inst
> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
> Warning: multiple methods tables found for 'export'
> Error in loadNamespace(j <- i[[1L]], c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[j]]) :
> namespace 'rtracklayer' 1.48.0 is already loaded, but >= 1.51.5 is required
> Calls: <Anonymous> ... namespaceImportFrom -> asNamespace -> loadNamespace
> Execution halted
> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package 'CNVScope'
> * removing 'd:/RCompile/CRANguest/R-devel/lib/CNVScope'
>
> These errors tend to be check server dependent (only occurs on r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64<https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_flavors.html#r-devel-windows-ix86_x86_64>) and I'm just trying to make the small change to closeAllConnections() that was asked earlier of maintainers by Kurt Hornik and the CRAN team, but I can't because of this old package version on the devel check server, which has the same error:
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CNVScope_3.5.7_20210518_062953/Windows/00check.log
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/CNVScope_3.5.7_20210518_062953/Windows/00install.out
>
> Is there any way around this? I notice the maintainer of the 'gtsummary' package had a similar issue:
>
> "> I am trying to make a release that depends on gt v0.3.0, but I get an error
>
> > when I test the package on Windows Dev `devtools::check_win_devel()` that
>
> > the gt package is available but it's an unsuitable version. Does anyone
>
> > know why the gt v0.3.0 is unavailable?"
>
>
>
> I'm open to any suggestions, but can't see a way around this issue from my end without the ability to service the check server.
>
>
> Thanks,
> James Dalgleish
> Cancer Genetics Branch,
> Center for Cancer Research,
> National Cancer Institute,
> National Institutes of Health,
> Bethesda, MD
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
______________________________________________
R-package-devel using r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list