[R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do
Max Turgeon
M@x@Turgeon @end|ng |rom um@n|tob@@c@
Tue Sep 1 18:23:08 CEST 2020
Hi Matt,
If you addressed the issues with the current CRAN version, then I would go with Duncan's suggestion below and treat this as a false positive.
Best,
Max Turgeon
Assistant Professor
Department of Statistics
Department of Computer Science
University of Manitoba
maxturgeon.ca<http://maxturgeon.ca>
________________________________
From: Matt Dancho <mdancho using business-science.io>
Sent: September 1, 2020 11:18:52 AM
To: Duncan Murdoch
Cc: Max Turgeon; r-package-devel using r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do
Caution: This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba.
Hi Max,
I appreciate the quick response - The webshot should no longer be an issue. My latest submission has only one vignette and I switched all of the plots from interactive (which uses webshot to convert to PNG) to ggplot2 so webshot should not be necessary.
I think the CRAN Modeltime 0.2.0 results should be corrected. The only one I see that may still be an issue is the prophet library, which modeltime uses.
What do you think?
Matt Dancho | Founder, CEO | Business Science
p: 570-419-4337<tel:(570)%20419-4337> | www.business-science.io<http://www.business-science.io/>
Want to learn Data Science for Business? Get started today with Business Science<https://university.business-science.io/>.
[https://github.com/mdancho84/mdancho84.github.io/blob/master/img/social/bizsci.png?raw=true]<http://www.business-science.io/>[https://github.com/mdancho84/mdancho84.github.io/blob/master/img/social/linkedin.png?raw=true][https://github.com/mdancho84/mdancho84.github.io/blob/master/img/social/twitter.png?raw=true]<https://twitter.com/bizScienc>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2020 at 12:00 PM Duncan Murdoch <murdoch.duncan using gmail.com<mailto:murdoch.duncan using gmail.com>> wrote:
On 01/09/2020 11:52 a.m., Max Turgeon wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
>
> If you scroll down just below the Windows and Debian OKs, you'll see these lines:
>
>
> Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 1, WARN: 3, NOTE: 1, OK: 7
> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html
> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html>>
>
>
> It seems one of your vignettes is causing issues when trying to use phantomJS.
That message is about the version that's on CRAN, not the new
submission. I think Matt should just follow this directions: "If you
are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please reply-all
to this message and explain." Having OK results rejected sure seems
like a false positive!
Duncan Murdoch
>
>
> Best,
>
>
> Max Turgeon
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Statistics
> Department of Computer Science
> University of Manitoba
> maxturgeon.ca<http://maxturgeon.ca><http://maxturgeon.ca>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org<mailto:r-package-devel-bounces using r-project.org>> on behalf of Matt Dancho <mdancho using business-science.io<mailto:mdancho using business-science.io>>
> Sent: September 1, 2020 10:26:06 AM
> To: r-package-devel using r-project.org<mailto:r-package-devel using r-project.org>
> Subject: [R-pkg-devel] Modeltime 0.1.0 Submission Failing - Not Sure What To Do
>
> ********************************************************
> Caution: This message was sent from outside the University of Manitoba.
> ********************************************************
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm having a difficult time with the pre-tests for Modeltime 0.1.0, a new
> version that I'm trying to get onto CRAN. The pre-tests indicate Windows &
> Debian are OK. Any help would be much appreciated.
>
> Thanks, Matt
>
>
> *CRAN Pretest Results*
>
> Dear maintainer,
>
> package modeltime_0.1.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
> automatically, please see the following pre-tests:
> Windows: <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/modeltime_0.1.0_20200901_161424/Windows/00check.log
>>
> Status: OK
> Debian: <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/modeltime_0.1.0_20200901_161424/Debian/00check.log
>>
> Status: OK
>
> Last released version's CRAN status: ERROR: 1, WARN: 3, NOTE: 1, OK: 7
> See: <https://CRAN.R-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html
> <https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_modeltime.html>>
>
> CRAN Web: <https://cran.r-project.org/package=modeltime>
>
> Please fix all problems and resubmit a fixed version via the webform.
> If you are not sure how to fix the problems shown, please ask for help on
> the R-package-devel mailing list:
> <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel>
> If you are fairly certain the rejection is a false positive, please
> reply-all to this message and explain.
>
> More details are given in the directory:
> <
> https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/modeltime_0.1.0_20200901_161424/
>>
> The files will be removed after roughly 7 days.
>
> No strong reverse dependencies to be checked.
>
> Best regards,
> CRAN teams' auto-check service
> Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
> Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: NA
> Maintainer: 'Matt Dancho <mdancho using business-science.io<mailto:mdancho using business-science.io>>'
>
> Flavor: r-devel-windows-ix86+x86_64
> Check: Overall checktime, Result: NOTE
> Overall checktime 16 min > 10 min
>
> Flavor: r-devel-linux-x86_64-debian-gcc
> Check: CRAN incoming feasibility, Result: Note_to_CRAN_maintainers
> Maintainer: 'Matt Dancho <mdancho using business-science.io<mailto:mdancho using business-science.io>>'
>
>
>
> *Matt Dancho | Founder, CEO | Business Science*
> p: 570-419-4337 <(570)%20419-4337> | www.business-science.io<http://www.business-science.io><http://www.business-science.io>
>
> Want to learn Data Science for Business? Get started today with Business
> Science <https://university.business-science.io/>.
>
> <http://www.business-science.io/> <https://twitter.com/bizScienc>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org<mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list