[R-pkg-devel] Fwd: CRAN submission radsafer 2.1.0
Mark van der Loo
m@rk@v@nder|oo @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Wed Dec 18 08:54:51 CET 2019
I am not sure which 'check result page' you mean, but presumably you mean
this one: https://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_radsafer.html
The e-mail you got asks you to confirm that you are the author of the
submitted package. After confirmation (and checking the boxes on the
confirmation page) the package will be staged for build and check at CRAN.
Once your package passes this stage, it is released on CRAN. After that it
takes some days before your package has been built and checked at the
different architectures listed on the CRAN check results page.
HTH,
Mark
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 12:23 AM Mark Hogue <mark.hogue.chp using gmail.com>
wrote:
> This package is ready to submit, except I am concerned about one thing. The
> package version listed on the check result page is 2.0.1, whereas this
> version is 2.1.0. Should I go ahead and submit it, or is there some problem
> I need to fix?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: Package Submission <cran-sysadmin using xmpalantir.wu.ac.at>
> Date: Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 5:55 PM
> Subject: CRAN submission radsafer 2.1.0
> To: Mark Hogue <mark.hogue.chp using gmail.com>
>
>
> Dear Mark Hogue
> Someone has submitted the package radsafer to CRAN.
> You are receiving this email to confirm the submission as the maintainer of
> this package.
> To confirm the submission to CRAN, follow or copy & paste the following
> link into your browser:
>
>
> https://xmpalantir.wu.ac.at/cransubmit/conf_mail.php?code=c9a3cccd75150cf5bf6235645d8bee6b
>
> If you did not submit the package or do not wish for it to be submitted to
> CRAN, simply ignore this email
>
> Submission Information:
> Submitter: Mark Hogue <mark.hogue.chp using gmail.com>
> Package: radsafer
> Version: 2.1.0
> Title: Radiation Safety
> Author(s): Mark Hogue <mark.hogue.chp using gmail.com>
> Maintainer: Mark Hogue <mark.hogue.chp using gmail.com>
> Depends: R (>= 3.5.0)
> Suggests: testthat, scatterplot3d, beepr, knitr, rmarkdown
> Description: Provides functions for radiation safety, also known as
> "radiation protection" and "radiological control". The
> science of radiation protection is called "health physics"
> and its engineering functions are called "radiological
> engineering". Functions in this package cover many of the
> computations needed by radiation safety professionals.
> Examples include: obtaining updated calibration and source
> check values for radiation monitors to account for
> radioactive decay in a reference source, simulating
> instrument readings to better understand measurement
> uncertainty, correcting instrument readings for geometry and
> ambient atmospheric conditions. Many of these functions are
> described in Johnson and Kirby (2011, ISBN-13:
> 978-1609134198). Utilities are also included for developing
> inputs and processing outputs with radiation transport codes,
> such as MCNP, a general-purpose Monte Carlo N-Particle code
> that can be used for neutron, photon, electron, or coupled
> neutron/photon/electron transport (Werner et. al. (2018)
> <doi:10.2172/1419730>).
> License: GPL-3
> Imports: ggplot2, readr, stats, graphics, RadData, stringr, magrittr,
> dplyr, rlang
>
>
> Submitter's comment: ## Test environments
> * local Windows 10 home version
> 1809, R 3.6.2
> * ubuntu 16.04 and Fedora Linux (on
> R-hub builder), R 3.6.2
>
> ## R CMD check results
> There
> were no ERRORs or WARNINGs. There was one NOTE,
> referring to non-standard files in the check
> directory. These are output files resulting from
> functions that provide text files to the user's
> working or specified other directory.
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list