[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz
Sebastian Meyer
@eb@meyer @end|ng |rom |@u@de
Thu Apr 4 13:34:44 CEST 2019
There are probably no clairvoyants around here. So, again, without
access to the up-to-date source code of your package, nobody will be
able to help.
"there is no package called ..." means that the given package is not
installed in any of the libraries currently in use by R (see .libPaths()
for the relevant paths). Maybe you have installed "dplyr" in a library
used by your standard R installation, but not in any library used by
your R-devel installation (which you seem to use for checking the
package)? Just a wild guess.
Am 04.04.19 um 13:14 schrieb cartograflow using gmail.com:
> I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used
> "conflicted".
>
> So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem
> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
> vI[[i]]) :
> there is no package called ‘dplyr’
>
> How I can solve this issue?
>
> Thanks in advance
>
> Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer
> <seb.meyer using fau.de> a écrit :
>
>
> Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
> not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
> working on these conflicts now.
>
> However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
> (https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
> I see the following output below these messages
>
>> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
>> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd)
>> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
>> argument is of length zero
>
> So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
> vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).
>
> Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see
>
>> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero
>
> and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from
>
>> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris",
>> coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources =
> "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS
> 2414 RIATE, 2018.",
>> scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos =
> "topright"),
>> col = "grey")
>
> So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
> wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sebastian
>
>
> Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow using gmail.com
> <mailto:cartograflow using gmail.com>:
>>
>> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to
> solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance
>>
>> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow using gmail.com
> <mailto:cartograflow using gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I come back to you because I have always the problem with
> devtools::check of my package.
>>>
>>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel :
>>> sylvain using sylvain <mailto:sylvain using sylvain>:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD
> check --as-cran
> /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>>
>>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr :
>>> Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>> The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>> filter, lag
>>> The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>> intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>>
>>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the
> namespace the package conflicted.
>>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning.
>>>
>>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in
> loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
>>>
>>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible?
>>> Thanks in advance to your help !
>>> Sylvain
>>> -----------------
>>> Below extract of 00check.log
>>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
>>> Installation failed.
>>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
>>> * DONE
>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>>
>>> Below 00install.out
>>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
>>> ** using staged installation
>>> ** R
>>> ** inst
>>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck =
> vI[[i]]) :
>>> there is no package called ‘conflicted’
>>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts ->
> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
>>> Exécution arrêtée
>>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
>>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson
> <henrik.bengtsson using gmail.com <mailto:henrik.bengtsson using gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>>
>>> FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
>>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>>
>>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow <cartograflow using gmail.com
> <mailto:cartograflow using gmail.com>>’
>>>
>>> New submission
>>>
>>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
>>>
>>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>>> flowmapping (7:41)
>>>
>>> Author field should be Authors using R. <mailto:Authors using R.> Current value is:
>>> c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
>>> "francoise.bahoken using ifsttar.fr <mailto:francoise.bahoken using ifsttar.fr>",
> role = c("cre","aut")),
>>> person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>>> "blondeau.sylvain using yahoo.fr <mailto:blondeau.sylvain using yahoo.fr>", role
> = c("aut"))
>>>
>>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>>> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
>>> In title case that is:
>>> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
>>>
>>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there"). The
>>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>>>
>>> /Henrik
>>>
>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow using gmail.com
> <mailto:cartograflow using gmail.com>
>>> <cartograflow using gmail.com <mailto:cartograflow using gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi, l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to
> use r-devel?
>>>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made
> dev_tool::check.
>>>> How can I solve my problem ?
>>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>>>
>>>> Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe
> Ligges<ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de
> <mailto:ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de>> a écrit : I cannot beloeve
> it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>>>>
>>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>>>
>>>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>>>
>>>> with a recent R-devel version on the package tarball should reproduce
>>>> the findings.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow using gmail.com
> <mailto:cartograflow using gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from
> your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks
> automatically.Debian:
> <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>>>
>>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the
> check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args =
> c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>>>>> ── R CMD check results ──────────────────────────── cartograflow
> 0.0.0.9000 ────
>>>>> Duration: 54.6s
>>>>> 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
>>>>> R CMD check succeeded
>>>>> Can you help me to fix the problem?
>>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>>
>>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org
> <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org> mailing list
>>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org>
> mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
>>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org>
> mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org>
> mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel using r-project.org <mailto:R-package-devel using r-project.org>
> mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list