[R-pkg-devel] Re :Re: package cartograflow_0.0.0.9000.tar.gz

c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com c@rtogr@iiow m@iii@g oii gm@ii@com
Thu Apr 4 13:14:35 CEST 2019


 I follow up your recommendation and for the moment I didn't used "conflicted". 

So, I've made the nex R CMD check and I have the problem 
Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
  there is no package called ‘dplyr’
How I can  solve this issue? 

Thanks in advance

    Le jeudi 4 avril 2019 à 08:22:26 UTC+2, Sebastian Meyer <seb.meyer using fau.de> a écrit :  
 
 Note that output concerning masked objects are just messages which do
not cause your vignette to fail. So it is not stricly necessary to start
working on these conflicts now.

However, looking closely at the win-builder check results
(https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Windows/00check.log),
I see the following output below these messages

> Warning in eval(expr, envir, enclos) : NAs introduced by coercion
> Quitting from lines 529-573 (cartograflow.Rmd) 
> Error: processing vignette 'cartograflow.Rmd' failed with diagnostics:
> argument is of length zero

So the problem actually is in lines 529-573 of the cartograflow.Rmd
vignette (at least in the version submitted to win-builder a few weeks ago).

Running tools::buildVignette("cartograflow.Rmd") locally, I see

> Error in if (horiz) { : argument is of length zero

and the subsequent traceback() shows that the error originates from

> layoutLayer(title = "Professional mobility in Greater Paris", 
>        coltitle = "black", author = "Cartograflow, 2019", sources = "Sources : data : INSEE, RP, MOBPRO, 2017 ; basemap : IGN, APUR, UMS 2414 RIATE, 2018.", 
>        scale = 0.2, tabtitle = TRUE, frame = TRUE, north(pos = "topright"), 
>        col = "grey")

So it seems to me that the unnamed argument 'north(pos = "topright")' is
wrongly matched to the "horiz" argument of layoutLayer().

Cheers,

    Sebastian


Am 04.04.19 um 07:20 schrieb cartograflow using gmail.com:
> 
> Hi,I don't know if my explanations are clear.I tried several way to solve this problem w/o success. Someone have an idea ?Thanks in advance 
> 
> On 2019-04-03 2:11 p.m., cartograflow using gmail.com wrote:
>>   Hi, 
>>
>> I come back to you  because I have always the problem with devtools::check of my package. 
>>
>> I used the command to check my package with R-devel : 
>> sylvain using sylvain:~/svn$ bash R-devel.sh CMD check --as-cran /home/sylvain/work/12_R_studio/package/cartograflow_0.0.0.1.tar.gz
>>
>> When I start the rmd file there is a warning due to package dplyr : 
>>         Attaching package: 'dplyr'
>>         The following objects are masked from 'package:stats':
>>                     filter, lag
>>         The following objects are masked from 'package:base':
>>                     intersect, setdiff, setequal, union
>>
>> The solve this issue I added in rmd file, description file and the namespace the package conflicted. 
>> So, the package conflicted avoid to have this warning. 
>>
>> But when I run R-devel CMD check I have a new issue that is Error in loadNamespace...no package called ‘conflicted’ (see below)
>>
>> Can you help me to solve this issue if tit's possible? 
>> Thanks in advance to your help ! 
>> Sylvain
>> -----------------
>> Below extract of 00check.log 
>> * checking whether package ‘cartograflow’ can be installed ... ERROR
>> Installation failed.
>> See ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/00install.out’ for details.
>> * DONE
>> Status: 1 ERROR, 1 NOTE
>>
>> Below 00install.out 
>> * installing *source* package ‘cartograflow’ ...
>> ** using staged installation
>> ** R
>> ** inst
>> ** byte-compile and prepare package for lazy loading
>> Error in loadNamespace(i, c(lib.loc, .libPaths()), versionCheck = vI[[i]]) : 
>>   there is no package called ‘conflicted’
>> Calls: <Anonymous> ... loadNamespace -> withRestarts -> withOneRestart -> doWithOneRestart
>> Exécution arrêtée
>> ERROR: lazy loading failed for package ‘cartograflow’
>> * removing ‘/home/sylvain/svn/cartograflow.Rcheck/cartograflow’
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     Le mardi 26 mars 2019 à 22:42:21 UTC+1, Henrik Bengtsson <henrik.bengtsson using gmail.com> a écrit :  
>>   
>>   FWIW, you should be able to reproduce at least the following NOTEs
>> with your current R 3.5.2 and R CMD check --as-cran:
>>
>> * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE
>> Maintainer: ‘cartogRaflow <cartograflow using gmail.com>’
>>
>> New submission
>>
>> Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000)
>>
>> Possibly mis-spelled words in DESCRIPTION:
>>   flowmapping (7:41)
>>
>> Author field should be Authors using R.  Current value is:
>>   c(person("Françoise", "Bahoken", email =
>> "francoise.bahoken using ifsttar.fr", role = c("cre","aut")),
>>             person("Sylvain", "Blondeau", email =
>> "blondeau.sylvain using yahoo.fr", role = c("aut"))
>>
>> The Title field should be in title case. Current version is:
>> ‘thematic cartography of flows and movements’
>> In title case that is:
>> ‘Thematic Cartography of Flows and Movements’
>>
>> Those are all classical mistakes ("we've all been there").  The
>> vignette errors may or may not be specific to R devel.
>>
>> /Henrik
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:29 PM cartograflow using gmail.com
>> <cartograflow using gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,  l've made R CMD check --as-cran on rstudio 3.5.2Why I have to use r-devel?
>>> I confirm that I didn't received à error message when I've made dev_tool::check.
>>> How can I solve my problem ?
>>> Thanks in advance Sylvain
>>>
>>>
>>> nvoyé depuis Yahoo Mail pour Android
>>>
>>>   Le lun., mars 25, 2019 à 23:38, Uwe Ligges<ligges using statistik.tu-dortmund.de> a écrit :  I cannot beloeve it. But this is certainly not R-devel?
>>>
>>> Not sure about devtools which we do not use on CRAN, but simply
>>>
>>> R CMD check --as-cran
>>>
>>> with a recent R-devel  version on the package tarball should reproduce
>>> the findings.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Uwe Ligges
>>>
>>>
>>> On 25.03.2019 23:12, cartograflow using gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>> I've submitted my package cartograflow and I received an email from your teeam that it does not pass the incoming checks automatically.Debian: <https://win-builder.r-project.org/incoming_pretest/cartograflow_0.0.0.9000_20190324_230822/Debian/00check.log>
>>>> Status: 1 ERROR, 2 WARNINGs, 1 NOTE
>>>>
>>>> So, I've made the new check on my plateform (linux ubuntu) and the check is OK.I used : ==> devtools::check(args = c('--no-manual','--as-cran'))Status is :
>>>> ── R CMD check results ──────────────────────────── cartograflow 0.0.0.9000 ────
>>>> Duration: 54.6s
>>>> 0 errors ✔ | 0 warnings ✔ | 0 notes ✔
>>>> R CMD check succeeded
>>>> Can you  help me to fix the problem?
>>>> Thanks in advance to your replySylvain
>>>>     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>         [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel  
>>     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>>
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>  
> 
> 
>     [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> 
  
	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list