[R-pkg-devel] Errors in Package Check Results due to package in Suggestions

[Joshua Ulrich]

Hi Daniel,

See section 1.1.3.1 of Writing R Extensions:
https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-exts.html#Suggested-packages

On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 2:53 AM, Daniel Lüdecke <d.luedecke at uke.de> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a package on CRAN where most check results are OK except two with
> errors (one of those two I'm already addressing).
>
> However, the one of the errors
> (https://www.r-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-release-osx-x86_64/sjstats-00chec
> k.html) is because I use the package "rstanarm" for one of the examples, and
> running this example fails. What would be an appropriate way to deal with
> this issue? My package does not depend on rstanarm, it's "just" a suggestion
> because I needed it for the examples. I'm a bit unsure about the status of
> these check results. When submitting a package, the maintainer is asked to
> address issues from these checks, so I'd like to fix this error. I could, of
> course, wrap the example into a "don't run"-section, but this seems to me
> like a sloppy hack rather than a proper solution...
>
> Best
> Daniel
>
>
> --
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts; Gerichtsstand: Hamburg | www.uke.de
> Vorstandsmitglieder: Prof. Dr. Burkhard Göke (Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr. Dr. Uwe Koch-Gromus, Joachim Prölß, Martina Saurin (komm.)
> _____________________________________________________________________
>
> SAVE PAPER - THINK BEFORE PRINTING
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



-- 
Joshua Ulrich  |  about.me/joshuaulrich
FOSS Trading  |  www.fosstrading.com
R/Finance 2017 | www.rinfinance.com