[R-pkg-devel] Package Submission: issues with R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols'

[Vineetha Warriyar Kodalore Vijayan]

Hi Ege,


Thank you!

In the init.c file,  do I have to change 'void' to corresponding declaration?

E.g:

extern void F77_NAME(datacon)(void *, void *, void *, void *, void *, void *, void *, void *, void *, void *, void *);


Also, how do I know the package passes the CRAN incoming feasibility as it does not show any warnings or notes on my R CMD CHECK --as-cran. Re submit and see again?


Regards,

Vineetha Warriyar

________________________________
From: R-package-devel <r-package-devel-bounces at r-project.org> on behalf of Ege Rubak <rubak at math.aau.dk>
Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2017 9:35:36 AM
To: r-package-devel at r-project.org
Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] Package Submission: issues with R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols'

Hi,

This is something that has gotten quite a bit of attention recently due
to the coming R 3.4 giving a NOTE when routines aren't declared. You
should be able to find info on this list or elsewhere.
Basically you need to make a file called e.g. init.c in your src/ with
the appropriate code. This file can be auto-generated for you as
described by Dirk here:
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2017/03/30/#002_even_easier_package_registration

Good luck!

Ege

On 04/13/2017 11:14 PM, Vineetha Warriyar Kodalore Vijayan wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> When I submitted my R package to CRAN, it didn't go through the automatic incoming check, resulting the following NOTE.  I tested on my macOS with R CMD CHECK and R CMD --as-cran, both went through with one NOTE ( Maintainer: NOTE).
>
> * checking compiled code ... NOTE
> File 'EpiILM/libs/i386/EpiILM.dll':
>   Found no calls to: 'R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols'
> File 'EpiILM/libs/x64/EpiILM.dll':
>   Found no calls to: 'R_registerRoutines', 'R_useDynamicSymbols'
>
> It is good practice to register native routines and to disable symbol
> search.
>
> See 'Writing portable packages' in the 'Writing R Extensions' manual.
>
> I did go through the manual (section 5.4), but didn't understand much. Can someone help to resolve this issue?
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vineetha
>
>
>        [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>

______________________________________________
R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel

	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]