[R-pkg-devel] What to do when you can't reproduce CRAN R CMD check unit test failures?

Kevin Ushey kevinushey at gmail.com
Thu May 12 08:09:08 CEST 2016


Is it possible that `getwd()` is reporting something on the CRAN build
servers that your `decompose_path()` doesn't handle? For example, your
tests fail for me if I run them while in the root directory (on OS X).

Kevin

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Richard Cotton <richierocks at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Bob,
>
> I'd forgotten about the option to run win-builder against R-devel.
>
> Though it seems that in this case, all the tests are passing there too.
>
> http://win-builder.r-project.org/21kc9XGKdANF/examples_and_tests/tests_i386/testthat.Rout
> http://win-builder.r-project.org/21kc9XGKdANF/examples_and_tests/tests_x64/testthat.Rout
>
> I'm now completely out of ideas as to where the problem could be.
>
>
> On 11 May 2016 at 15:46, boB Rudis <bob at rudis.net> wrote:
>> did you try winbuilder R-devel? I occasionally (ok, often) forget to
>> do that and it sometimes kick out different errors than R-devel on
>> local systems.
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 2:40 AM, Richard Cotton <richierocks at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Yesterday I uploaded a new version of the pathological package to
>>> CRAN.  It was initially accepted but today I got a message saying that
>>> some of the tests for the decompose_path function are failing under
>>> Windows.
>>>
>>> I've tested the package on a local Windows 10 machine with R-3.3.0 and
>>> R-devel, and in Win 7 and Win 8 compatibility modes, and on Windows
>>> Server 2012 via AppVeyor.  In all cases, all the tests pass.
>>>
>>> I tried the CRAN win builder service today, and again, all tests pass.
>>> http://win-builder.r-project.org/0ZrX4I75nvzM/examples_and_tests/tests_i386/testthat.Rout
>>> http://win-builder.r-project.org/0ZrX4I75nvzM/examples_and_tests/tests_x64/testthat.Rout
>>>
>>> The failure portion of the output I got from Uwe is as follows:
>>>
>>> * checking tests ... ERROR
>>> Running the tests in 'tests/testthat.R' failed.
>>> Last 13 lines of output:
>>>   1. Failure: decompose_path handles paths with no directory and a
>>> single extension in the filename. (@test_decompose_path.R#42)
>>>   2. Failure: decompose_path handles paths with no directory and a
>>> double extension in the filename. (@test_decompose_path.R#72)
>>>   3. Failure: decompose_path handles paths with no directory and no
>>> extension in the filename. (@test_decompose_path.R#103)
>>>   4. Failure: decompose_path handles filenames containing a '.' and an
>>> extension. (@test_decompose_path.R#133)
>>>   5. Failure: decompose_path handles the current directory as '.'.
>>> (@test_decompose_path.R#221)
>>>   6. Failure: decompose_path handles the parent directory as '..'.
>>> (@test_decompose_path.R#236)
>>>   7. Failure: decompose_path handles files inside '.'.
>>> (@test_decompose_path.R#251)
>>>   8. Failure: decompose_path works with a character vector input.
>>> (@test_decompose_path.R#321)
>>>   9. Failure: decompose_path works with a factor input.
>>> (@test_decompose_path.R#333)
>>>   1. ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Since this isn't hugely informative as to the problem, I'd like
>>> general advice on how I can diagnose a failing test when I can't
>>> reproduce it.
>>>
>>> It would also be useful if anyone can run R CMD check and see if they
>>> find test failures.
>>>
>>> The CRAN release is here (the problematic version is 0.0-8):
>>> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/pathological
>>>
>>> and the github version is currently in the same state, available here:
>>> https://github.com/richierocks/pathological
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>> Richie
>>>
>>> Learning R
>>> 4dpiecharts.com
>>>
>>> ______________________________________________
>>> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Richie
>
> Learning R
> 4dpiecharts.com
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list