[R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN reviewer
Carlos Cinelli
carloscinelli at hotmail.com
Wed Jan 27 14:00:52 CET 2016
I have been using win-builder and Gabor's R-Builder .
You can use win-builder either from the webpage (http://win-builder.r-project.org/) or using the function build_win() from Hadley's devtools package. Win-builder will test both r-devel and r-release in Windows.
As for r-builder, you will can use it with Travis or Semaphore (see https://github.com/metacran/r-builder). It will test with r-oldrel, r-release and r-devel in Linux.
> From: r-package-devel-request at r-project.org
> Subject: R-package-devel Digest, Vol 9, Issue 10
> To: r-package-devel at r-project.org
> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:00:02 +0100
>
> Send R-package-devel mailing list submissions to
> r-package-devel at r-project.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> r-package-devel-request at r-project.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> r-package-devel-owner at r-project.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of R-package-devel digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Adah Zhang)
> 2. Re: R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Ben Bolker)
> 3. Re: R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
> 4. Re: R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Uwe Ligges)
> 5. Re: R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Sven E. Templer)
> 6. Re: R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Adah Zhang)
> 7. Re: R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN
> reviewer (Dirk Eddelbuettel)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:03:01 -0500
> From: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>
> To: r-package-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for me
> than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID:
> <CAHHtEr-oJKLEcC_=O9gPAHEka_PKUATURryiyzV_HdE+SPY4XQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hello,
>
> I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
>
> How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
>
> Thanks,
> Adah
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 14:53:46 -0500
> From: Ben Bolker <bbolker at gmail.com>
> To: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>
> Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for
> me than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID:
> <CABghstT3UekAVR5t=PeEKrQbcVURBb+yQQpWWsPtrkpdpv_rEg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> The most common scenario is that you're using R-release and the
> warnings are coming from the R-devel version, which often has a bunch
> of new, additional tests.
>
> The other frequent answer to this question (is there a FAQ list for
> this mailing list yet?) is that using CRAN's win-builder service is a
> very easy way to get access to the R-release and R-devel tests without
> changing anything in your local setup.
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> > in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> > CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> > (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
> >
> > How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> > not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> > examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> > goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Adah
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:54:22 -0600
> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
> To: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>
> Cc: r-package-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for
> me than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID: <22183.52974.754694.397246 at max.nulle.part>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 14:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
> | I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> | in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> | CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> | (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
> |
> | How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> | not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> | examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> | goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
>
> "Use a different computer."
>
> That is not as flippant as it sounds because
>
> -- thanks to Uwe you have r-release and r-devel on Windows just one ftp
> submission away
>
> -- thanks to Carl and yours truly you can also try a variety of Docker
> containers for R including r-devel prebuilt and even SAN/ASAN/UBSAN
> flavours
>
> -- the remainer of campus should offer some choices too though that relies
> on your local contacts.
>
> Sometimes these things are of course also due to something else but as you
> supplied nothing concrete or reproducible I cannot be more specific either.
>
> Hope this helps. It's the right list for the question.
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 20:54:38 +0100
> From: Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> To: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>, r-package-devel at r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for
> me than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID: <56A7CEFE.5070501 at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>
>
> On 26.01.2016 20:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> > in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> > CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> > (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
> >
> > How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> > not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> > examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> > goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
>
> The reviewer uses a recent version of R-devel (i.e. a daily built), a
> recent set of packages (i.e. run update.packages() first) and then
>
> R CMD check --as-cran (well, at least similar, but you will get the
> warnings you talk about if you do that, as I already told you when you
> asked CRAN).
>
> Best,
> Uwe Ligges
>
>
>
> > Thanks,
> > Adah
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 21:53:51 +0100
> From: "Sven E. Templer" <sven.templer at gmail.com>
> To: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>
> Cc: List r-package-devel <r-package-devel at r-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for
> me than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID: <A2B7448B-3344-4EA5-833A-79CC44661871 at icloud.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Dear Adah,
>
> win-builder is fairly easy, but once you've setup a github repository using
>
> https://github.com/metacran/r-builder
>
> you might save even that few amount of work.
>
> Best,
> Sven
>
> > On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 26 January 2016 at 14:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
> > | I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> > | in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> > | CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> > | (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
> > |
> > | How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> > | not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> > | examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> > | goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
> >
> > "Use a different computer."
> >
> > That is not as flippant as it sounds because
> >
> > -- thanks to Uwe you have r-release and r-devel on Windows just one ftp
> > submission away
> >
> > -- thanks to Carl and yours truly you can also try a variety of Docker
> > containers for R including r-devel prebuilt and even SAN/ASAN/UBSAN
> > flavours
> >
> > -- the remainer of campus should offer some choices too though that relies
> > on your local contacts.
> >
> > Sometimes these things are of course also due to something else but as you
> > supplied nothing concrete or reproducible I cannot be more specific either.
> >
> > Hope this helps. It's the right list for the question.
> >
> > Dirk
> >
> > --
> > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 16:13:20 -0500
> From: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>
> To: "Sven E. Templer" <sven.templer at gmail.com>
> Cc: List r-package-devel <r-package-devel at r-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for
> me than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID: <DDEF22D7-FD31-4367-AF43-2D33D399E3C8 at case.edu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Thanks for all the suggestions! I'm working off of a Mac, so I don't think win-builder would work for my case.
>
>
> > On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:53 PM, Sven E. Templer <sven.templer at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Adah,
> >
> > win-builder is fairly easy, but once you've setup a github repository using
> >
> > https://github.com/metacran/r-builder
> >
> > you might save even that few amount of work.
> >
> > Best,
> > Sven
> >
> >> On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 26 January 2016 at 14:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
> >> | I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> >> | in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> >> | CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> >> | (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
> >> |
> >> | How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> >> | not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> >> | examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> >> | goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
> >>
> >> "Use a different computer."
> >>
> >> That is not as flippant as it sounds because
> >>
> >> -- thanks to Uwe you have r-release and r-devel on Windows just one ftp
> >> submission away
> >>
> >> -- thanks to Carl and yours truly you can also try a variety of Docker
> >> containers for R including r-devel prebuilt and even SAN/ASAN/UBSAN
> >> flavours
> >>
> >> -- the remainer of campus should offer some choices too though that relies
> >> on your local contacts.
> >>
> >> Sometimes these things are of course also due to something else but as you
> >> supplied nothing concrete or reproducible I cannot be more specific either.
> >>
> >> Hope this helps. It's the right list for the question.
> >>
> >> Dirk
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
> >>
> >> ______________________________________________
> >> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 15:35:42 -0600
> From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org>
> To: Adah Zhang <asz25 at case.edu>
> Cc: List r-package-devel <r-package-devel at r-project.org>
> Subject: Re: [R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for
> me than CRAN reviewer
> Message-ID: <22183.59054.312112.535814 at max.nulle.part>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>
> On 26 January 2016 at 16:13, Adah Zhang wrote:
> | Thanks for all the suggestions! I'm working off of a Mac, so I don't think win-builder would work for my case.
>
> Wrong. Read http://win-builder.r-project.org. It is a _service_ that you
> submit _source_ tarballs to. Which is why I called it just one ftp away:
>
> | >> On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> | >> -- thanks to Uwe you have r-release and r-devel on Windows just one ftp
> | >> submission away
>
> Dirk
>
> --
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> R-package-devel mailing list
> R-package-devel at r-project.org
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of R-package-devel Digest, Vol 9, Issue 10
> **********************************************
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the R-package-devel
mailing list