[R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN reviewer

Uwe Ligges ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de
Tue Jan 26 20:54:38 CET 2016



On 26.01.2016 20:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
>
> How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?

The reviewer uses a recent version of R-devel (i.e. a daily built), a 
recent set of packages (i.e. run update.packages() first) and then

R CMD check --as-cran (well, at least similar, but you will get the 
warnings you talk about if you do that, as I already told you when you 
asked CRAN).

Best,
Uwe Ligges



> Thanks,
> Adah
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel
>



More information about the R-package-devel mailing list