[R-pkg-devel] R CMD check yielding different results for me than CRAN reviewer

[Sven E. Templer]

Dear Adah,

win-builder is fairly easy, but once you've setup a github repository using

https://github.com/metacran/r-builder

you might save even that few amount of work.

Best,
Sven

> On 26 Jan 2016, at 20:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 26 January 2016 at 14:03, Adah Zhang wrote:
> | I am running R CMD check (and also with the --as-cran flag), which results
> | in all OK's in my 00check.log. However, after submitting the package, the
> | CRAN reviewer tells me of a warning/error regarding one of my examples
> | (which is easily fix-able if I got the warning myself).
> | 
> | How do I ensure that all warnings, errors, and notes are addressed if I do
> | not receive these when running the standard checks or when testing the
> | examples myself? Is there a standard order of commands that a CRAN reviewer
> | goes through aside from 'R CMD check'?
> 
> "Use a different computer."
> 
> That is not as flippant as it sounds because
> 
> -- thanks to Uwe you have r-release and r-devel on Windows just one ftp
>    submission away
> 
> -- thanks to Carl and yours truly you can also try a variety of Docker
>    containers for R including r-devel prebuilt and even SAN/ASAN/UBSAN
>    flavours
> 
> -- the remainer of campus should offer some choices too though that relies
>    on your local contacts.
> 
> Sometimes these things are of course also due to something else but as you
> supplied nothing concrete or reproducible I cannot be more specific either.
> 
> Hope this helps.  It's the right list for the question.
> 
> Dirk
> 
> -- 
> http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd at debian.org
> 
> ______________________________________________
> R-package-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel