[R] < symbols in a data frame
Claudia Beleites
claudia.beleites at ipht-jena.de
Wed Jul 9 22:49:58 CEST 2014
Hi Sam,
> But this may not be the important issue here at all. If "<k" means the
> value is left censored at k -- i.e. we know it's less than k but not
> how much less -- than Sarah's proposal is not what you want to do.
> Exactly what you do want to do depends on context, and as it concerns
> statistical methodology, is not something that should be discussed
> here. Consult a local statistician if this is a correct guess.
I'd like to chime in with Bert's advise here. Unless the < LOQs are
very few*, they have the potential to seriously mess up any further data
analysis.
Actually, I'd recommend you go one step back and ask the analysis lab
whether they can supply you with the uncensored data, specifying the
LOQ separately.
A while ago I posted some illustrations about such censoring
at LOQ situations on cross validated, which may help you in forming a
decision how to go on:
http://stats.stackexchange.com/a/30739/4598
Claudia (Analytical Chemist & Chemometrician)
*or you know that they'll not matter for the particular data analysis
you want to do
--
Claudia Beleites, Chemist
Spectroscopy/Imaging
Leibniz Institute of Photonic Technology
Albert-Einstein-Str. 9
07745 Jena
Germany
email: claudia.beleites at ipht-jena.de
phone: +49 3641 206-133
fax: +49 2641 206-399
More information about the R-help
mailing list