[R] completing missing samples

David Winsemius dwinsemius at comcast.net
Sat Sep 17 23:50:08 CEST 2011

On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Joshua Wiley wrote:

> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Joshua Wiley  
> <jwiley.psych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Eran,
>> You have already gotten some suggestions from Michael, but I think
>> that Rich is correct to question the rational.

I hope we should question the rationale, and doubt that Rich has  
forsaken the rational.

>>  Any mechanism you
>> choose to replace the missing values will impose its structure on the
>> data. Veritate ab absurdo:
> or verum?  who remembers their Latin declensions?

Veritas is third declension.

David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT

More information about the R-help mailing list