[R] completing missing samples
dwinsemius at comcast.net
Sat Sep 17 23:50:08 CEST 2011
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Joshua Wiley wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Joshua Wiley
> <jwiley.psych at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Eran,
>> You have already gotten some suggestions from Michael, but I think
>> that Rich is correct to question the rational.
I hope we should question the rationale, and doubt that Rich has
forsaken the rational.
>> Any mechanism you
>> choose to replace the missing values will impose its structure on the
>> data. Veritate ab absurdo:
> or verum? who remembers their Latin declensions?
Veritas is third declension.
David Winsemius, MD
West Hartford, CT
More information about the R-help