[R] completing missing samples

[Joshua Wiley]

On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Joshua Wiley <jwiley.psych at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Eran,
>
> You have already gotten some suggestions from Michael, but I think
> that Rich is correct to question the rational.  Any mechanism you
> choose to replace the missing values will impose its structure on the
> data. Veritate ab absurdo:

or verum?  who remembers their Latin declensions?