[R] classification table in logistic regression
Peter Flom
peterflomconsulting at mindspring.com
Thu Jun 4 11:49:29 CEST 2009
Frank E Harrell Jr <f.harrell at vanderbilt.edu> wrote
>Armida,
>
>I regret putting CTABLE as an option on the old SAS PROC LOGIS which was
>a basis for PROC LOGISTIC. Classification tables are arbitrary and
>misleading so I would stay away from them.
>
>You might build a model with and without the variable of interest and
>plot the two predicted probabilities against each other for more insight
>than what is provided by a classification table.
>
Frank,
I agree with 'arbitrary' but why 'misleading'? Purely for the same sorts
of reasons that histograms can be misleading, or for other reasons, as well?
Plotting the probabilities is an excellent idea, I recommend it often, in a variety
of situations.
Peter
Peter L. Flom, PhD
Statistical Consultant
www DOT peterflomconsulting DOT com
More information about the R-help
mailing list