[R] glmmPQL in 2.3.1
bolker at zoo.ufl.edu
Sun Oct 29 20:38:32 CET 2006
Christian Gold <c.gold <at> magnet.at> writes:
> I have come across the previous communication on this list in September
> (copied below) because I had received the same error message.
> I understand from Brian Ripley's reply that anova should not be used
> with glmmPQL because it is not an adequate method, and that this is now
> shown with an error message.
> My question is, what method *should* be used? Using summary does not
> give me the result I want, because it shows the significance of each
> combination of factor *levels*, rather than factors, which can quickly
> become very hard to interpret.
use lmer (in the lme4 package) with the "family" argument
set, to do real (or restricted) rather than quasi-likelihood
More information about the R-help