[Hmisc] proposal for change in latex.summary.formula.reverse (was: [R] Sweave: superfluous newline (`\\') in tex file)
Patrick Drechsler
patrick.drechsler at gmx.net
Tue Sep 28 07:50:54 CEST 2004
Hi,
well, it wasn't a Sweave problem after all. Seems to have
something to do with the function
`latex.summary.formula.reverse' in the package Hmisc.
Following change seems to help (at least for my purpose):
--8<------------------------schnipp------------------------->8---
*** /usr/local/lib/R/library/Hmisc/R/Hmisc 2004-09-28 07:37:26.000000000 +0200
--- /usr/local/lib/R/library/Hmisc/R/Hmisc.original 2004-09-28 07:38:28.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 16156,16162 ****
'Numbers after percents are frequencies.',
sep="\n")
if(length(testUsed))
! legend <-paste(legend,'\n\n',
if(length(testUsed)==1)'Test used:' else 'Tests used:',
if(length(testUsed)==1) paste(testUsed,'test') else
paste(paste('$^{',1:length(testUsed),'}$',testUsed,
--- 16156,16162 ----
'Numbers after percents are frequencies.',
sep="\n")
if(length(testUsed))
! legend <-paste(legend,'\\\\\n','\n\n',
if(length(testUsed)==1)'Test used:' else 'Tests used:',
if(length(testUsed)==1) paste(testUsed,'test') else
paste(paste('$^{',1:length(testUsed),'}$',testUsed,
--8<------------------------schnapp------------------------->8---
But since my knowledge of R is rather small I have no idea if
these has any other drawbacks.
Any comments?
How would I go about changing this for my setup only? Is
renaming Hmisc to something like pdHmisc ok?
Patrick
--
Do you remember when you only had to pay
for windows when *you* broke them?
More information about the R-help
mailing list