[R] SCO and R

[Patrick Gamble]

>The article made the point that the ideas behind GPL
> are under attack precisely because no one is making
> sure that the code being put into the freely available
> packages isn't owned by someone else.

Shouldn't that be rephrased?

How about

'can't be sure that a bunch of unprincipled people won't attempt 
to use the law to grab money on the basis of very, very dubious 
patents'?