[R] A suggestion regarding multiple replies
(Ted Harding)
Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk
Sat Nov 15 01:30:42 CET 2003
On 14-Nov-03 partha_bagchi at hgsi.com wrote:
> Please don't take this the wrong way. There are a lot of extremely
> helpful people who subscribe to r-help.
>
> I was wondering if it is time to adopt a strategy a-la Splus help
> whereby people reply to the author and the author summarizes all the
> replies?
>
> Just a thought and have a good weekend.
> Partha
This has its merits, in reducing the load on the list and its readers.
However, personally I like the way questions are bounced around between
people. and answers are devoped "conversationally", as it were, and I
think a lot would be lost if this were not to happen. On the whole,
I welcome the load!
R strikes me as somewhat special amongst languages in that there are
a lot of hidden subtleties, which sometimes are only pointed out by
the few people who are really familiar with them. At present this
happens on-list and usually very promptly, and this timely intervention
puts wrong ideas right before they get too deeply embedded; this
benefit would tend to vanish if a "summarise to the list" policy
were adopted.
Of course there are some cases where a simple answer can be sent directly
to a person asking a simple question, but my experience is that I have
learned a lot about R by watching these dynamic discussions. I hope they
will continue!
Best wishes to all,
Ted.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
E-Mail: (Ted Harding) <Ted.Harding at nessie.mcc.ac.uk>
Fax-to-email: +44 (0)870 167 1972
Date: 15-Nov-03 Time: 00:30:42
------------------------------ XFMail ------------------------------
More information about the R-help
mailing list