[Rd] should base R have a piping operator ?
Iñaki Ucar
|uc@r @end|ng |rom |edor@project@org
Sat Oct 5 18:45:44 CEST 2019
On Sat, 5 Oct 2019 at 18:10, Rui Barradas <ruipbarradas using sapo.pt> wrote:
>
> R is a functional language, pipes are not.
How would you classify them? Pipes are analogous to function
composition. In that sense, they are more functional than classes, and
R does have classes.
Anyway, I don't see "purity" as a valid argument either in favour or
against any given feature. Language classification may be useful for
theorists, but certainly not for practitioners.
Iñaki
More information about the R-devel
mailing list