[Rd] R CMD build then check fails on R-devel due to serialization version
james.f.hester at gmail.com
Thu Jan 11 14:08:32 CET 2018
This change poses difficulties for automated build systems such as
travis-ci, which is widely used in the R community. In particular
because this is a WARNING and not a NOTE this causes all R-devel
builds with vignettes to fail, as the default settings fail the build
if R CMD check issues a WARNING.
The simplest change would be for R-core to change this message to be a
NOTE rather than a WARNING, the serialization could still be tested
and there would be a check against vignettes built with R-devel, but
it would not cause these builds to fail.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 3:52 PM, Duncan Murdoch
<murdoch.duncan at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/01/2018 1:26 PM, Neal Richardson wrote:
>> Since yesterday I'm seeing `R CMD check --as-cran` failures on the
>> R-devel daily build (specifically, R Under development (unstable)
>> (2018-01-09 r74100)) for multiple packages:
>> * checking serialized R objects in the sources ... WARNING
>> Found file(s) with version 3 serialization:
>> Such files are only readable in R >= 3.5.0.
>> Recreate them with R < 3.5.0 or save(version = 2) or saveRDS(version =
>> 2) as appropriate
>> As far as I can tell, revision 74099
>> which changes the default serialization format to 3, clashes with
>> revision 73973
>> which checks that serialized R objects are _not_ version 3. It seems
>> that with the current development version of R, if you `R CMD build`
>> and then run `R CMD check --as-cran` on the built package, it will
> I think the message basically says: don't do that. You should build with
> R-release for now. You always need to check with R-devel, so life is
> If you build with R-devel without forcing the old format, nobody using
> R-release will be able to use your tarball.
> Eventually I guess the new format will be accepted by CRAN, but it will
> likely be a while: nobody expects everyone to instantly upgrade to a new R
> release, let alone to an unreleased development version.
> Presumably that particular file (build/vignette.rds) could be automatically
> built in the old format for now, but the new format needs testing, so it
> makes sense to me to leave it as a default, even if it makes it more
> complicated to submit a package to CRAN.
> Duncan Murdoch
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
More information about the R-devel