[Rd] R CMD check and error in an \Sexpr in an Rd file
Martin Maechler
maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch
Mon Oct 31 16:42:06 CET 2011
> Thank you very much Duncan, Uwe and Peter. Sorry if I
> missed the announcement, I follow more r-devel than
> r-help, which I find a bit hard to quickly read.
But please --- this concerns every one on R-devel ---
if you do not subscribe to R-help,
then do subscribe to R-announce -- that one has about
one posting *per month* and is really only for important
announcements (and basically reserved for R-core to post).
See a list of *all* R-announce postings of 2011 :
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-announce/2011/date.html
with the 2.14.0 announcement at the end.
Martin Maechler, ETH Zurich
> Will try now on the 2.14.0.
> Renaud
> On 31/10/2011 14:28, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
>> On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>>
>>> I do not see it on main CRAN home page.
>>
>> No, but see the announcement on R-announce this morning:
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-help/2011-October/294203.html
>>
>> Things which need human intervention can take some hours:
>> the CRAN front page and binary distributions are two of
>> those.
>>
>>> Do you mean
>>> http://cran.r-project.org/src/base-prerelease/R-latest.tar.gz
>>> ?
>>>
>>> On 31/10/2011 14:19, Uwe Ligges wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 31.10.2011 13:13, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>>>>> Thank you Duncan.
>>>>>
>>>>> I tried with: * using R version 2.14.0 RC (2011-10-24
>>>>> r57417) * using platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>>>> (64-bit)
>>>>>
>>>>> But I still get the errors for verbatim multiline and
>>>>> the strange error if an error occurs in \Sexpr. Is
>>>>> your patch included in this version? I will try now
>>>>> with R-rc_2011-10-27_r57452.tar.gz.
>>>>
>>>> Try R-2.14.0, it is already released. Or R-devel.
>>>>
>>>> Best, Uwe Ligges
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Renaud
>>>>
>>>> On 28/10/2011 17:25, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>>> On 28/10/2011 10:53 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>>>>> On 28/10/2011 10:49 AM, Renaud Gaujoux wrote:
>>>>>> > Hi,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > another Rd related issue I encountered is that if an error occurs
>>>>>> in an
>>>>>> > \Sexpr in an Rd file, then on get the following error:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > * checking for portable compilation flags in Makevars ... OK
>>>>>> > * checking for portable use of $(BLAS_LIBS) and $(LAPACK_LIBS)
>>>>>> ... OK
>>>>>> > * checking examples ... ERROR
>>>>>> > Error in paste(before, x, after, sep = "") : object 'exfile'
>>>>>> not found
>>>>>> > Execution halted
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > To reproduce, put a call like this in an Rd section:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > \Sexpr[results=verbatim, stage=render]{x<- 1; stop("sexpr error")}
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The strange thing is that it occurs at the example checking step.
>>>>>> > Not sure why it does not break before.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Thank you.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Renaud
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > PS: I am on R version 2.13.2 (2011-09-30) - x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
>>>>>> (64-bit)
>>>>>> >
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would update to 2.13.2 patched, or the release candidate of
>>>>>> 2.14.0.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops, sorry, 2.13.2 is "final", so I didn't backport the patch.
>>>>> 2.14.0
>>>>> is what you should get.
>>>>>
>>>>> Duncan Murdoch
>>>>
>>>> ______________________________________________
>>>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>>>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>> ______________________________________________
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
>> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>>
>
______________________________________________
R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
More information about the R-devel
mailing list