[Rd] Holding back on source code
djsamperi at gmail.com
Tue Nov 29 04:21:33 CET 2011
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Prof Brian Ripley
<ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk> wrote:
> On 27/11/2011 23:07, Sachinthaka Abeywardana wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> A few years back when I was a CSIRO (an Australian research centre) intern
>> I developed a BLAS package for R that uses the GPU. I believe that there
>> something similar right now, except it uses a few CuBLAS (Nvidia BLAS)
>> routines, but doesnt replace them.
> We haven't much idea what 'something similar' refers to.
>> My question is, is it technically illegal to hold back on source code?
> It depends entirely on the licenses involved. Nothing prevents Adobe
> distributing Acrobat without source code, for example.
> This is the R development list: questions not specific to R are best asked
> elsewhere (and, to take a recent example, that includes questions about
> licenses of packages on R-forge or CRAN). 'Elsewhere' may mean an IP
One side-effect of R's GPL-based license is that there are many
if you include members of the R core, R Foundation, R package
contributors, etc., and
any discussion (with an IP lawyer, say) about possible violation of
license terms would
require input from each of these groups.
Perhaps a new mailing list R-license-policy would be helpful...
>> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> Brian D. Ripley, ripley at stats.ox.ac.uk
> Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
> University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
> 1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272866 (PA)
> Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
> R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
More information about the R-devel