[Rd] some problems reported in 00check.log

[carol white]

Thank you for your reply.

--- On Fri, 9/17/10, Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de> wrote:

> From: Uwe Ligges <ligges at statistik.tu-dortmund.de>
> Subject: Re: [Rd] some problems reported in 00check.log
> To: "carol white" <wht_crl at yahoo.com>
> Cc: r-devel at r-project.org
> Date: Friday, September 17, 2010, 10:45 AM
> 

> 
regarding the point 3,
Suppose I have a data set, data.set1 with data.set1.Rd and data.set2 with data.set2.Rd that are related to each other. then, I put in \seealso field

in data.set2.Rd
\seealso{
 See Also as \code{\link{data.set1}}

and in data.set1.Rd
\seealso{
 See Also as \code{\link{data.set2}}

But I get the aforementioned warning that I don't understand why.
> > Missing link(s) in documentation object
> './man/object.name.Rd':
> > object.name

There is another problem. I have installed two packages in another path than the library path of R. how could I load them for R CMD check (where to indicate the path for lib.loc) as I get error message due to require of these two packages in different functions?

> 
> > 3- Although I use the alias of an Rd file of my
> package in cross references:
> >
> > \seealso{
> > See Also as \code{\link{object.name}}
> > }
> > where object.name is the name of an Rd file without
> Rd
> 
> What is "an Rd file without Rd"?
> 
> 
> > , I get the following warning
> >
> > Missing link(s) in documentation object
> './man/object.name.Rd':
> > object.name
> 
> This means you cited the help page itself?
> 
> I think you need to tell us the alias(es) you used as well
> as the 
> purpose of this one.
> 
> 
> >
> >   I don't think that I will have use
> the name of my package.
> 
> 
> Why is this related?
> 
> Best wishes,
> Uwe Ligges
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Look forward to your reply,
> >
> >   Carol
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ______________________________________________
> > R-devel at r-project.org
> mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
>