[Rd] idea for GSoC: an R package for fitting Bayesian Hierarchical Models
Ben Bolker
bolker at ufl.edu
Mon Mar 24 12:39:06 CET 2008
Antonio, Fabio Di Narzo <antonio.fabio <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
I agree that quantitative differences in speed can make
a qualitative difference in the way one works.
Well, I'm somewhat interested, but don't feel that I'm
necessarily appropriate as a mentor. I don't think it would
be terrible if you contacted particular people (Gelman, Plummer,
O'Hara?) to see if they were interested ... they could always
say no ...
> >
> > Something I would love to see done (not that I have the time
> > and energy to supervise someone to do it right now) would be
> > an R (or Python/etc.: R wouldn't necessarily be the best tool)
> > to translate lmer/nlme syntax (Wilkinson-Rogers with extensions
> > for specifying random factors, correlation structures, etc.)
> > into a BUGS file. It strikes me that it would be a really nice
> > way to bridge the gap between what mixed-model code can do
> > and what requires BUGS/MCMC. Such models could also serve as
> > (1) a way to cross-check the results of mixed model code;
> > (2) a way to get started in relaxing the assumptions of mixed
> > models (e.g. allowing for non-normal random effects distributions).
>
> That sounds interesting. However, I currenlty don't have enough
> know-how to work at something like it now.
Do you think so? I don't think it would be too hard,
if you were interested ...
Ben
More information about the R-devel
mailing list