[Rd] NEWS file (was faqs)
friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de
friedrich.leisch at stat.uni-muenchen.de
Fri Nov 16 11:43:54 CET 2007
>>>>> On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 10:20:36 +0000 (GMT),
>>>>> Prof Brian Ripley (PBR) wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2007, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>
>> On Nov 15, 2007, at 10:53 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/15/2007 9:57 AM, Simon Urbanek wrote:
>>>> On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:55 PM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>>>>> inst/NEWS would have the advantage of consistency with R itself
>>>>> which also has a NEWS file.
>>>>>
>>>> I vote for NEWS for reasons above plus because that's what I use in
>>>> my packages already ;).
>>>> IMHO it should be installed automatically if present, i.e. it
>>>> shouldn't be necessary to have it in inst/NEWS, just plain NEWS
>>>> should suffice.
>>>
>>> And you're volunteering to make that change?
>>>
>>
>> Yup, in R-devel now (43464). However, there are other candidate files
>> as well and we don't do anything with the NEWS file just yet ... any
>> further ideas?
> We've recommended inst/NEWS for some time (some people are late to this
> party), and tens of packages have it. However, a further tens of packages
> have a top-level NEWS, and I would assume that (at least some of) the
> authors were deliberately not installing it and so will now need to rename
> it.
> I think the writeup needs to make clear what happens if you have both NEWS
> and inst/NEWS (some packages do).
As most having both are by me I also checked the rest: In all cases
on CRAN they are identical copies. I have a soft link in all my
packages from inst/NEWS to top level (such that it gets installed, but
it is also easily found in the sources).
If we install the top-level NEWS file I would remove the link (but as
Brian said, we've been there before).
Best,
Fritz
More information about the R-devel
mailing list