[Rd] memory issues with new release (PR#9344)
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk
Mon Nov 6 21:42:14 CET 2006
"Derek Stephen Elmerick" <delmeric at gmail.com> writes:
> Thanks for the replies. Point taken regarding submission protocol. I have
> included a text file attachment that shows the R output with version 2.3.=
0and
> 2.4.0. A label distinguishing the version is included in the comments.
>=20
> A quick background on the attached example. The dataset has 650,000 recor=
ds
> and 32 variables. the response is dichotomous (0/1) and i ran a logistic
> model (i previously mentioned multinomial, but decided to start simple for
> the example). Covariates in the model may be continuous or categorical, b=
ut
> all are numeric. You'll notice that the code is the same for both version=
s;
> however, there is a memory error with the 2.3.0 version. i ran this sever=
al
> times and in different orders to make sure it was not some sort of hardwa=
re
> issue.
>=20
> If there is some sort of additional output that would be helpful, I can
> provide as well. Or, if there is nothing I can do, that is fine also.
I don't think it was ever possible to request 4GB on XP. The version
difference might be caused by different response to invalid input in
memory.limit(). What does memory.limit(NA) tell you after the call to
memory.limit(4095) in the two versions?=20
If that is not the reason: What is the *real* restriction of memory on
your system? Do you actually have 4GB in your system (RAM+swap)?=20
Your design matrix is on the order of 160 MB, so shouldn't be a
problem with a GB-sized workspace. However, three copies of it will
brush against 512 MB, and it's not unlikely to have that many copies
around.=20
=20
> -Derek
>=20
>=20
> On 11/6/06, Kasper Daniel Hansen <khansen at stat.berkeley.edu> wrote:
> >
> > It would be helpful to produce a script that reproduces the error on
> > your system. And include details on the size of your data set and
> > what you are doing with it. It is unclear what function is actually
> > causing the error and such. Really, in order to do something about it
> > you need to show how to actually obtain the error.
> >
> > To my knowledge nothing _major_ has happened with the memory
> > consumption, but of course R could use slightly more memory for
> > specific purposes.
> >
> > But chances are that this is not really memory related but more
> > related to the functions your are using - perhaps a bug or perhaps a
> > user error.
> >
> > Kasper
> >
> > On Nov 6, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Derek Stephen Elmerick wrote:
> >
> > > thanks for the friendly reply. i think my description was fairly
> > > clear: i
> > > import a large dataset and run a model. using the same dataset, the
> > > process worked previously and it doesn't work now. if the new
> > > version of R
> > > requires more memory and this compromises some basic data analyses,
> > > i would
> > > label this as a bug. if this memory issue was mentioned in the
> > > documentation, then i apologize. this email was clearly not well
> > > received,
> > > so if there is a more appropriate place to post these sort of
> > > questions,
> > > that would be helpful.
> > >
> > > -derek
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06 Nov 2006 18:20:33 +0100, Peter Dalgaard
> > > <p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk>
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> delmeric at gmail.com writes:
> > >>
> > >>> Full_Name: Derek Elmerick
> > >>> Version: 2.4.0
> > >>> OS: Windows XP
> > >>> Submission from: (NULL) ( 38.117.162.243)
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> hello -
> > >>>
> > >>> i have some code that i run regularly using R version 2.3.x . the
> > >>> final
> > >> step of
> > >>> the code is to build a multinomial logit model. the dataset is
> > >>> large;
> > >> however, i
> > >>> have not had issues in the past. i just installed the 2.4.0
> > >>> version of R
> > >> and now
> > >>> have memory allocation issues. to verify, i ran the code again
> > >>> against
> > >> the 2.3
> > >>> version and no problems. since i have set the memory limit to the
> > >>> max
> > >> size, i
> > >>> have no alternative but to downgrade to the 2.3 version. thoughts?
> > >>
> > >> And what do you expect the maintainers to do about it? ( I.e. why are
> > >> you filing a bug report.)
> > >>
> > >> You give absolutely no handle on what the cause of the problem might
> > >> be, or even to reproduce it. It may be a bug, or maybe just R
> > >> requiring more memory to run than previously.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard =C3=98ster Farimagsgade 5, En=
tr.B
> > >> c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
> > >> (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45)
> > >> 35327918
> > >> ~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45)
> > >> 35327907
> > >>
> > >
> > > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > ______________________________________________
> > > R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> >
> >
>=20
>=20
>=20
> > ######
> > ### R 2.4.0
> > ######
> >=20
> > rm(list=3Dls(all=3DTRUE))
> > memory.limit(size=3D4095)
> NULL
> >=20
> > clnt=3Dread.table(file=3D"K:\\all_data_reduced_vars.dat",header=3DT,sep=
=3D"\t")
> >=20
> > chk.rsp=3Dglm(formula =3D resp_chkonly ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 +
> + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 +
> + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x19 +x20 +
> + x21 + x22 +x23 + x24 + x25 + x26 +x27 +=20
> + x28 + x29 + x30 + x27*x29 + x28*x30, family =3D binomial,=20
> + data =3D clnt)
> Error: cannot allocate vector of size 167578 Kb
> >=20
> > dim(clnt)
> [1] 650000 32
> > sum(clnt)
> [1] 112671553493
> >=20
>=20
> ##################################################
> ##################################################
>=20
> > ######
> > ### R 2.3.0
> > ######
> >=20
> > rm(list=3Dls(all=3DTRUE))
> > memory.limit(size=3D4095)
> NULL
> >=20
> > clnt=3Dread.table(file=3D"K:\\all_data_reduced_vars.dat",header=3DT,sep=
=3D"\t")
> >=20
> > chk.rsp=3Dglm(formula =3D resp_chkonly ~ x1 + x2 + x3 + x4 +
> + x5 + x6 + x7 + x8 + x9 + x10 + x11 + x12 + x13 +
> + x14 + x15 + x16 + x17 + x18 + x19 +x20 +
> + x21 + x22 +x23 + x24 + x25 + x26 +x27 +=20
> + x28 + x29 + x30 + x27*x29 + x28*x30, family =3D binomial,=20
> + data =3D clnt)
> >=20
> > dim(clnt)
> [1] 650000 32
> > sum(clnt)
> [1] 112671553493
> >=20
--=20
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard =C3=98ster Farimagsgade 5, Entr.B
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics PO Box 2099, 1014 Cph. K
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard at biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
More information about the R-devel
mailing list