[Rd] R 2.3.0 and rgl on OS X 10.4.6 (PR#8833)

[Simon Urbanek]

Neely,

as Duncan was saying R-SIG-Mac is a better place to discuss it.

On May 4, 2006, at 2:08 PM, eatkinso at mdanderson.org wrote:

> I just downloaded and installed R 2.3.0 on my Mac G5 running OS X  
> 10.4.6. I also updated with R.app revision 3114 as ecommended. Now,  
> when I attemp to use package rgl
> I get the error
>
>> library(rgl)
> Error: package 'rgl' is not installed for 'arch=ppc'

This usually means that you have an old package for R 2.2.0 and you  
are trying to use it in R 2.3.0. *)

> I have tried reinstalling from CRAN using both binary and source.  
> The source install fails, The binary install yields
>

AFAIR rgl is currently broken, so there is no binary:
http://r.research.att.com/reports/tiger-universal/results/2.3.0/html/ 
rgl.report.html
I remember fixing this a while ago - it wasn't as simple as casting,  
because the structures are wrong, but I'll see if I can dig out the fix.

> The same problem occurs with some packages (e1071, svmpath) but not  
> others (gdata, gplots, gtools).
>

My guess is that you forgot to re-install them (or you have old local  
packages somewhere). This happens most often if you install libraries  
in your home directory. On OS X it's usually much safer to use system- 
wide packages, because that prevents cross-version problems, version- 
confusion and the GUI allows you to re-install them automatically.  
That doesn't work for your local packages in home.

Cheers,
Simon

*) - for completeness, you also get this error if you install a  
binary that was not built for the universal R or if the ppc  
architecture build failed. However, neither should not happen with  
CRAN binaries.