[Rd] NAMESPACE and bundle

[Iago Mosqueira]

El jue, 22-06-2006 a las 10:37 -0400, Paul Gilbert escribió:
> Iago
> 
> I think your R code file  needs an .onLoad function.  Here is the 
> ..onLoad from my dse1 package which is in the dse bundle, as is tframe,  
> along with comments which I had forgotten.
> 
> ..onLoad  <- function(library, section) {
>    .DSEflags(list(COMPILED=TRUE, DUP=TRUE))
>    # next require is necessary for bundle check to run examples, 
>    # but does not seem to be necessary when packages are not bundled
>    require("tframe")
>    invisible(TRUE)
>    }
> 
> 
> Hope this works,
> Paul

Hi,

Thanks for the tip. I already had an .onLoad() function, with 

.onLoad <- function(lib,pkg) {
	require(methods)
        require(FLCore)
}

the first to comply with the needs of an S4 package, the second to solve
the internal dependency that outside of the bundle is solved with
Depends: in DESCRIPTION.

Is there anything else I could look at?

Thanks,


Iago



Iago Mosqueira wrote:

> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Paul Gilbert [mailto:pgilbert at bank-banque-canada.ca]
> > Enviado el: jue 22/06/2006 15:47
> > Para: Iago Mosqueira
> > CC: r-devel at r-project.org
> > Asunto: Re: [Rd] NAMESPACE and bundle
>
> > Iago
>
> > There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differently
than
> > individual package checking in this regard.  I think it has to do
with
> > when the namespace gets registered, or something like that. As I
recall,
> > the work around is to explicitely require  the package in the test
files
> > for it. I.e. put
> >   require("pac")
> > in all the files in pac/tests.   If that does not work, let me know
and
> > I will look more carefully to find what I had to do.
>
> > Paul
>
>
> Paul,
>
> Many thanks. The problem is in the examples contained in the Rd
files, 
> where we do not explictely load the package, as we do in test files. 
> But it is only a problem for the examples in this package, not in the 
> others that share the same package dependencies. Can you see any 
> solution or something I else I should check for?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Iago
>
>
> Iago Mosqueira wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >I have a package that passes R CMD check, and shows no problems when 
> using all its methods as declared in NAMESPACE. When this package is 
> added to a bundle, which already consists of 5 packages, the examples 
> in the Rd pages thta call a number of methods fail during the bundle 
> check. These all passed when check is run on this package alone.
Other 
> packages in the bundle are very similar, in that all import all S4 
> classes and methods from the first package (using import("FLCore") in 
> NAMESPACE) in the bundle, and export their own overloaded methods.
> >
> >If I run check on a mini-bundle consisting only of the main package 
> (FLCore) and this problematic package, it shows no problem. So I 
> assume a problem of NAMESPACE conflict is the culprit, but 
> experimnting with various package combinations, to try and isolate
the 
> conflict, has not worked. This package seems to conflict with every 
> other secondary package.
> >
> >I am dealing with internal dependencies by adding a require(FLCore) 
> line to the .onLoad() call in zzz.R
> >
> >Can anybody point me at what to look for? What could be the reason 
> for this problem?
> >
> >I hope the explanation was clear enough. Many thanks,
> >
> >
> >Iago
> >
> >
> >Dr. Iago Mosqueira
> >
> >Marine Research Division
> >AZTI Tecnalia
> >Txatxarramendi Ugartea, z/g
> >48395 Sukarrieta - Bizkaia
> >Spain
> >
> >+34 946 029 448
> >+34 946 029 400
> >+34 946 029 401 (Fax)
> >
> >imosqueira at suk.azti.es
> >http://www.azti.es/
> >
> > 
> >
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >______________________________________________
> >R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> > 
> >