[Rd] NAMESPACE and bundle

[Paul Gilbert]

Iago

I think your R code file  needs an .onLoad function.  Here is the 
..onLoad from my dse1 package which is in the dse bundle, as is tframe,  
along with comments which I had forgotten.

..onLoad  <- function(library, section) {
   .DSEflags(list(COMPILED=TRUE, DUP=TRUE))
   # next require is necessary for bundle check to run examples, 
   # but does not seem to be necessary when packages are not bundled
   require("tframe")
   invisible(TRUE)
   }


Hope this works,
Paul

Iago Mosqueira wrote:

> > -----Mensaje original-----
> > De: Paul Gilbert [mailto:pgilbert at bank-banque-canada.ca]
> > Enviado el: jue 22/06/2006 15:47
> > Para: Iago Mosqueira
> > CC: r-devel at r-project.org
> > Asunto: Re: [Rd] NAMESPACE and bundle
>
> > Iago
>
> > There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differently than
> > individual package checking in this regard.  I think it has to do with
> > when the namespace gets registered, or something like that. As I recall,
> > the work around is to explicitely require  the package in the test files
> > for it. I.e. put
> >   require("pac")
> > in all the files in pac/tests.   If that does not work, let me know and
> > I will look more carefully to find what I had to do.
>
> > Paul
>
>
> Paul,
>
> Many thanks. The problem is in the examples contained in the Rd files, 
> where we do not explictely load the package, as we do in test files. 
> But it is only a problem for the examples in this package, not in the 
> others that share the same package dependencies. Can you see any 
> solution or something I else I should check for?
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Iago
>
>
> Iago Mosqueira wrote:
>
> >Dear all,
> >
> >I have a package that passes R CMD check, and shows no problems when 
> using all its methods as declared in NAMESPACE. When this package is 
> added to a bundle, which already consists of 5 packages, the examples 
> in the Rd pages thta call a number of methods fail during the bundle 
> check. These all passed when check is run on this package alone. Other 
> packages in the bundle are very similar, in that all import all S4 
> classes and methods from the first package (using import("FLCore") in 
> NAMESPACE) in the bundle, and export their own overloaded methods.
> >
> >If I run check on a mini-bundle consisting only of the main package 
> (FLCore) and this problematic package, it shows no problem. So I 
> assume a problem of NAMESPACE conflict is the culprit, but 
> experimnting with various package combinations, to try and isolate the 
> conflict, has not worked. This package seems to conflict with every 
> other secondary package.
> >
> >I am dealing with internal dependencies by adding a require(FLCore) 
> line to the .onLoad() call in zzz.R
> >
> >Can anybody point me at what to look for? What could be the reason 
> for this problem?
> >
> >I hope the explanation was clear enough. Many thanks,
> >
> >
> >Iago
> >
> >
> >Dr. Iago Mosqueira
> >
> >Marine Research Division
> >AZTI Tecnalia
> >Txatxarramendi Ugartea, z/g
> >48395 Sukarrieta - Bizkaia
> >Spain
> >
> >+34 946 029 448
> >+34 946 029 400
> >+34 946 029 401 (Fax)
> >
> >imosqueira at suk.azti.es
> >http://www.azti.es/
> >
> > 
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >______________________________________________
> >R-devel at r-project.org mailing list
> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
> > 
> >
> ====================================================================================
>
> La version française suit le texte anglais.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and 
> the Bank of
> Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or 
> copying of this
> email or the information it contains by other than the intended 
> recipient is
> unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it 
> immediately from
> your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou 
> confidentielle.
> La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. 
> Toute diffusion,
> utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il 
> contient par une
> personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si 
> vous recevez
> ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer 
> sans délai à
> l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez 
> éliminé de votre
> ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.
>
====================================================================================

La version française suit le texte anglais.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This email may contain privileged and/or confidential information, and the Bank of
Canada does not waive any related rights. Any distribution, use, or copying of this
email or the information it contains by other than the intended recipient is
unauthorized. If you received this email in error please delete it immediately from
your system and notify the sender promptly by email that you have done so. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Le présent courriel peut contenir de l'information privilégiée ou confidentielle.
La Banque du Canada ne renonce pas aux droits qui s'y rapportent. Toute diffusion,
utilisation ou copie de ce courriel ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une
personne autre que le ou les destinataires désignés est interdite. Si vous recevez
ce courriel par erreur, veuillez le supprimer immédiatement et envoyer sans délai à
l'expéditeur un message électronique pour l'aviser que vous avez éliminé de votre
ordinateur toute copie du courriel reçu.