[Rd] PATCH: Add fields argument to installed.packages and available.packages
Seth Falcon
sfalcon at fhcrc.org
Tue Aug 29 16:35:36 CEST 2006
Martin Maechler <maechler at stat.math.ethz.ch> writes:
> I like the idea and will look into applying the patch
> (note there's at least one typo which makes "make check" fail:
> /priotiry/)
Great. Sorry for the typo, I've sent an update privately.
> A propos:
>
> A while back (in last summer?), we (some of R-core) have
> discussed about a new field to be added to DESCRIPTION,
> and AFAIR, the only problem we had, is to find a name we
> all liked.
> Or was there more then the name alone, and some where convinced
> that it is superfluous and hence too complicated.
>
> The idea was a field related to but weaker than 'Suggests' :
> Something like
> 'canMakeUseOf: <pkg1> [, <pkg2>, ... ]
> which is *not* used in any QA/QC checking, but is purely
> informative: If <pkg1> is require()able, then some examples may
> look nicer, a function may provide another feature, etc, etc.
> Alternatives to 'canMakeUseOf' would have been
> 'isHappilyCoworkingWith' ....
>
> What do you (R-devel listeners) think about the idea?
Some thoughts:
* Beyond strict dependencies, it is useful for a package to be able to
declare that it "can use" other packages to provide additional
features _which may be platform specific_.
* It is useful to be able to check the non-optional parts when
non-essential packages are not available. In the case of platform
specific optional features, this is essential. Otherwise it would
be impossible to ever run check.
* Package vignettes, used heavily in Bioconductor, often require a set
of packages to be available to provide data and functions for a
coherent example analysis. These extra packages are often not used
directly by the package itself (neither dependency nor "can use").
A similar issue arises for examples included in package
documentation.
* It is useful to be able to check only those vignettes and examples
where the required packages available.
* If I were a new user/developer coming to R and read about Depends,
Suggests, and CanMakeUseOf, I would likely be confused.
With that in mind, I wonder if:
Suggests could mean "can use" and a compromise of some sort be
established w.r.t. to R CMD check (similar to --no-vignettes).
Depends.examples (or similar) be added which lists dependencies for
documentation examples and vignettes.
Best Wishes,
+ seth
More information about the R-devel
mailing list