[Rd] Suggestions for packages / help / index (long mail)
Adaikalavan Ramasamy
ramasamy at cancer.org.uk
Mon Nov 29 01:18:59 CET 2004
I am coming a bit late to the thread, so apologies if I am missing
something. I believe that it would be more useful to index functions to
particular keywords than a package itself.
I think we may have over-looked Prof. Harrell's suggestion
(https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-gui/2004-November/000410.html)
during the "Hidden costs of GPL software" thread.
His site (http://biostat.mc.vanderbilt.edu/s/finder/finder.html) is
quite useful. If this was turned into a wiki or something similar,
perhaps it could have much more benefit.
Regards, Adai
On Wed, 2004-11-24 at 14:15, Eric Lecoutre wrote:
> At 15:06 24/11/2004, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> >Eric Lecoutre <lecoutre <at> stat.ucl.ac.be> writes:
> >
> >: 6. Final point has already been discussed in the past. It is about misc
> >: packages and pieces of code. I propose the creation of 5 packages:
> >: - miscGraphics (keywords: misc, Graphics)
> >: - miscStatistics (keywords: misc, Statistics)
> >: - miscMathematics (keywords: misc, Mathematics)
> >: - miscBasics (keywords: misc, Basics)
> >: - miscProgramming (keywords: misc, Programming)
> >
> >Rather than preset the categories perhaps evolving them would
> >be better, just starting out with a single Misc package and then
> >decomposing it into multiple packages as the categories become
> >clear.
>
>
> Those categories are taken from KEYWORDS (master entries). I guess it
> wouldn't be difficult to still have substancial entries for those packages,
> if some misc package maintainer would make the job to break their package
> into pieces. BTW, I have to admit this choice is not easy to make for
> several reasons, the main one beeing to keep the ability to modify one's
> own contributions.
> For those packages, a collaborative plattform such as SourceForge and so
> on, with Sync-ability, could be a good choice.
>
> Eric
>
>
> Eric Lecoutre
> UCL / Institut de Statistique
> Voie du Roman Pays, 20
> 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve
> Belgium
>
> tel: (+32)(0)10473050
> lecoutre at stat.ucl.ac.be
> http://www.stat.ucl.ac.be/ISpersonnel/lecoutre
>
> If the statistics are boring, then you've got the wrong numbers. -Edward
> Tufte
>
> ______________________________________________
> R-devel at stat.math.ethz.ch mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
More information about the R-devel
mailing list