[Rd] plot(1:10,c(1)$nothing) yields index plot (PR#482)
Peter Dalgaard BSA
p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk
13 Mar 2000 20:49:02 +0100
Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:
> This turns out to be a bad idea, because we must be able to call plot(x)
> from other functions (with arbitrarily deep nesting), and it becomes very
> messy to trick plot() into handling the arguments correctly as they are
> passed from one function to another.
Actually, S-plus has that problem, not R:
> f<-function(x,y)g(x,y)
> g<-function(x,y)missing(y)
> f(2)
[1] F
where R propagates missings just fine:
> f<-function(x,y)g(x,y)
> g<-function(x,y)missing(y)
> f(2)
[1] TRUE
but given the amount of ported code we have to deal with, we probably
have to be able to deal with NULLs being passed to signify absent
arguments.
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._