[Rd] lm(rnorm(1000)~rnorm(1000)) kills rw1000 (PR#476)

Peter Dalgaard BSA p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk
07 Mar 2000 20:48:24 +0100


Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:

> A patch is
> 
> 1649,1652c1649
> <       if (j == rhs_response) {
> <           INTEGER(count)[j]=0;  /* need this initialised */
> <           continue;
> <       }
> ---
> >       if (j == rhs_response) continue;

Hmm, this wouldn't happen to cure the update(.~.-whateveritwas) case
by jfox, would it? (darn nasty one that one...)

-- 
   O__  ---- Peter Dalgaard             Blegdamsvej 3  
  c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics     2200 Cph. N   
 (*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen   Denmark      Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk)             FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !)  To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._