[Rd] lm(rnorm(1000)~rnorm(1000)) kills rw1000 (PR#476)
Peter Dalgaard BSA
p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk
07 Mar 2000 20:48:24 +0100
Thomas Lumley <thomas@biostat.washington.edu> writes:
> A patch is
>
> 1649,1652c1649
> < if (j == rhs_response) {
> < INTEGER(count)[j]=0; /* need this initialised */
> < continue;
> < }
> ---
> > if (j == rhs_response) continue;
Hmm, this wouldn't happen to cure the update(.~.-whateveritwas) case
by jfox, would it? (darn nasty one that one...)
--
O__ ---- Peter Dalgaard Blegdamsvej 3
c/ /'_ --- Dept. of Biostatistics 2200 Cph. N
(*) \(*) -- University of Copenhagen Denmark Ph: (+45) 35327918
~~~~~~~~~~ - (p.dalgaard@biostat.ku.dk) FAX: (+45) 35327907
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._