[Rd] anova-bug in R-version 1.0.0? (PR#470)
Prof Brian D Ripley
ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Mon, 6 Mar 2000 18:02:18 +0000 (GMT Standard Time)
On 6 Mar 2000, Peter Dalgaard BSA wrote:
> dtrenkler@nts6.oec.uni-osnabrueck.de writes:
>
> > Under R version 0.6.51 the following
> >
> > A_c(13,9,15,5,25,15,3,9,6,12)
> > B_c(42,24,41,19,27)
> > C_c(8,24,9,18,9,24,12,4)
> > D_c(9,12,7,18,2,18)
> > kaeufe_c(A,B,C,D)
> > region_factor(rep(1:4,c(10,5,8,6)),labels=LETTERS[1:4])
> > anova(lm(kaeufe~region))
> >
> > delivers
> >
> > Analysis of Variance Table
> >
> > Response: kaeufe
> > Df Sum Sq Mean Sq F value Pr(>F)
> > region 3 1474.65 491.55 8.7852 0.000376 ***
> > Residuals 25 1398.80 55.95
> > ---
> > Signif. codes: 0 `***' 0.001 `**' 0.01 `*' 0.05 `.' 0.1 ` ' 1
> >
> >
> > This is what I expected. Under RW 1.0.0 I get
> >
> > Analysis of Variance Table
> >
> > Response: kaeufe
> > Error in print.coefmat(x, digits = digits, signif.stars = signif.stars,
> > :
> > binary operator applied to invalid types
> >
> > Am I doing something wrong or is this a real bug?
>
> It's not happening on Unix... Does this happen when starting from a
> blank workspace?
It is also not happening on rw1000. Is your .Rprofile (if any) valid?
Try starting with --vanilla.
BDR
--
Brian D. Ripley, ripley@stats.ox.ac.uk
Professor of Applied Statistics, http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/~ripley/
University of Oxford, Tel: +44 1865 272861 (self)
1 South Parks Road, +44 1865 272860 (secr)
Oxford OX1 3TG, UK Fax: +44 1865 272595
-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-
r-devel mailing list -- Read http://www.ci.tuwien.ac.at/~hornik/R/R-FAQ.html
Send "info", "help", or "[un]subscribe"
(in the "body", not the subject !) To: r-devel-request@stat.math.ethz.ch
_._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._