[ESS-bugs] developer and trace
Richard M. Heiberger
rmh at temple.edu
Sun Oct 20 00:25:25 CEST 2013
very slick! thank you for the explanation.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Vitalie Spinu <spinuvit at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Richard, you are not typing in R but in the minibuffer. ESS detects
> "section:" and pops a request in the minibuffer. The reason is
> efficiency. First, you don't have to press RET. Second, if you are in
> script buffer and execute you code with C-c C-c (or whatever) you don't
> have to switch to *R* buffer to enter the number. I think mechanism is
> pretty straightforward and handy.
>
> Vitalie
>
> >>> "Richard M. Heiberger" on Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:07:45 -0400 wrote:
>
> > Since I just downloaded the current ESS version, I checked the
> > behavior that previously most annoyed me.
>
> > In C-c C-t bb ## to get recover
>
> > When I am sending lines from the .r buffer to the *R* buffer with C-c
> > C-n or C-c C-c
> > and I trigger the recover action, then
>
> > the cursor is in the .r buffer,
> > the request "Selection: " appears twice, in the *R* buffer and in the
> > mini-buffer.
> > I leave the cursor in the .r buffer and press a number.
> > The *R* buffer receives the number and goes to the right place in the
> > frame list.
>
> > YAY!
>
> > This is now behaving the way I want.
>
> > I don't understand why the mini-buffer is involved. But as long as I
> > can ignore the mini-buffer it is ok.
> > I did attempt to type a number directly in the mini-buffer.
> > *Messages* opened and the cursor went to the
> > *R*.
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > ESS-bugs ESS-bugs at r-project.org
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-bugs
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > ESS-core list: https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/ess-core
More information about the ESS-bugs
mailing list