[BioC] about limma linear models
Naomi Altman
naomi at stat.psu.edu
Mon May 16 18:15:14 CEST 2011
If you have biological replicates, then using LIMMA is preferred with
small sample sizes. If you have only technical replicates, then you
really cannot do a proper statistical analysis of the data. Since
you have a disconnected design, you might use separate channel
analysis to simplify the comparisons you want to make.
Regards,
Naomi Altman
At 07:40 AM 5/16/2011, =?GBK?B?va241Q==?= wrote:
>Hello Everyone!
>
>
>I'm now working with my expression microarray data by limma to
>detect differential expression probes. I have biology as my
>knowledge background ,not statistics, so I'm confused with the
>design matrix and contrast matrix in the limma usersguide. now i
>have read the target file
>as follows:
>SlideNumber FileName Cy3 Cy5
>1 1 15_1_3.txt BI BM
>2 2 15_1_4.txt BM BI
>3 3 18_1_2.txt BI2 BM2
>4 4 18_1_3.txt BM2 BI2
>5 5 16_1_1.txt BE2 BM2
>6 6 16_1_2.txt BM2 BE2
>
>
>because there is no connection from BI(or BM) to the other samples,
>dose that mean I have to contrast the differences(BI-BM, BI2-BM2,
>BE2-BM2, BE2-BI2) separately?
>Though I read the linear models and Empirical Bayes Methods theory
>carefully, I only know little. I wonder It is proper to detect
>differential expression by limma when there are only two replicates?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bioconductor mailing list
>Bioconductor at r-project.org
>https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>Search the archives:
>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list