[BioC] Suggestions on Agilent gene expression data

Kasper Daniel Hansen khansen at stat.Berkeley.EDU
Sat Jun 14 05:05:44 CEST 2008


This does not look at all like an Agilent data file from Feature  
Extractor. I suggest you contact your collaborators and get an idea  
about what you should use.

Kasper

On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:43 PM, ss wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> For whom is familiar with Agilent gene expression data, I would like  
> to
> ask help.
>
> We recently received some Agilent gene expression data from our
> collaborators. For individual sample, there are 7 corresponding  
> columns:
>
>  Unknown:Log(Ratio)  Unknown:Ratio  Unknown:Fold Change   
> Unknown:Log(Error)
> Unknown:P-Value  Unknown:Intensity 1  Unknown:Intensity 2
> It seems that Ratio= Intensity1/Intensity2. I wonder whether I  
> should use
> log2(Ratio) or Log(Ratio) or just Ratio for further analysis.  
> Besides, why
> should Ratio be calculated as Intensity1/Intensity2 instead of
> Intensity2/Intensity1?
>
> Thank you very much for your help in advance!
>
> Sincerely,
>      Allen
>
> 	[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor



More information about the Bioconductor mailing list