[BioC] Suggestions on Agilent gene expression data
Kasper Daniel Hansen
khansen at stat.Berkeley.EDU
Sat Jun 14 05:05:44 CEST 2008
This does not look at all like an Agilent data file from Feature
Extractor. I suggest you contact your collaborators and get an idea
about what you should use.
Kasper
On Jun 11, 2008, at 4:43 PM, ss wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> For whom is familiar with Agilent gene expression data, I would like
> to
> ask help.
>
> We recently received some Agilent gene expression data from our
> collaborators. For individual sample, there are 7 corresponding
> columns:
>
> Unknown:Log(Ratio) Unknown:Ratio Unknown:Fold Change
> Unknown:Log(Error)
> Unknown:P-Value Unknown:Intensity 1 Unknown:Intensity 2
> It seems that Ratio= Intensity1/Intensity2. I wonder whether I
> should use
> log2(Ratio) or Log(Ratio) or just Ratio for further analysis.
> Besides, why
> should Ratio be calculated as Intensity1/Intensity2 instead of
> Intensity2/Intensity1?
>
> Thank you very much for your help in advance!
>
> Sincerely,
> Allen
>
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list