[BioC] pm() mm() functionality changed?
James W. MacDonald
jmacdon at med.umich.edu
Thu Apr 6 20:44:45 CEST 2006
Dmitry wrote:
> Hi ALL,
>
> What happened to pm() and mm() functions?
> I'm running my old scripts:
>
> PM<-pm(Data)
> MM<-mm(Data)
> Cb<-cbind(PM,MM)
>
> And my Cb output looks like this:
>
> 1 378 52
> 2 930 486
> 3 1424 463
> 4 93 47
> 5 248 83
> 6 314 122
>
> But I need my old way with probe pair ids instead of indices:
>
> 1007_s_at1 649 371
> 1007_s_at2 952 1043
> 1007_s_at3 1640 2892
> 1007_s_at4 3505 4894
> 1007_s_at5 3703 2188
> 1007_s_at6 2822 1812
>
> I tried:
>
> GN<-probeNames(Data)
> PM<-pm(Data)
> MM<-mm(Data)
> Cb<-cbind(GN,PM,MM)
Try
Cb <- data.frame(PM, MM, row.names = make.names(GN, unique = TRUE))
HTH,
Jim
>
> But the Cb output doesn't identify probe pare numbers
>
> 1007_s_at 649 371
> 1007_s_at 952 1043
> 1007_s_at 1640 2892
> 1007_s_at 3505 4894
> 1007_s_at 3703 2188
> 1007_s_at 2822 1812
>
> Of cause I could script for those identifiers but is there a simple way to
> reproduce my old output with this altered pm() and mm()?
>
>
> Thank you
>
> Dmitry
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
> Search the archives: http://news.gmane.org/gmane.science.biology.informatics.conductor
--
James W. MacDonald, M.S.
Biostatistician
Affymetrix and cDNA Microarray Core
University of Michigan Cancer Center
1500 E. Medical Center Drive
7410 CCGC
Ann Arbor MI 48109
734-647-5623
**********************************************************
Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list