[BioC] metadata - annotation package changes

[John Zhang]

http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/byproduct.affx?

>If you were involved with building the previous releases you can probably 
>tell me where the 
>accession numbers for the previous releases (1.5,1.6,1.7)
>came from.
>Do you actually get them from the Affymetrix annotation files, 
>and if so, which section? For some probe sets different sections
>of the Affymetrix files give different accession numbers.

CSV files for chips under 
http://www.affymetrix.com/support/technical/byproduct.affx?


>
>Many thanks,
>Maria.
>
>
>On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, John Zhang wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 08:19:01 -0400 (EDT)
>> From: John Zhang <jzhang at jimmy.harvard.edu>
>> To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch, m.stalteri at mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk
>> Subject: Re: [BioC] metadata - annotation package changes
>> 
>> Although I was involved in building 1.8, Seth is probably the best one to 
answer 
>> this question. My understanding is that, correct me Seth if I am wrong, a set 
of 
>> fresh base files (probe id to GeneBank accession number mappings extracted 
from 
>> Affymetrix) were used to build the new version of annotation packages.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> >X-Original-To: jzhang at jimmy.harvard.edu
>> >Delivered-To: jzhang at jimmy.harvard.edu
>> >Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 10:22:47 +0100 (BST)
>> >From: Maria Stalteri <m.stalteri at mail.cryst.bbk.ac.uk>
>> >X-X-Sender: hstal01 at sark.cryst.bbk.ac.uk
>> >To: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>> >MIME-Version: 1.0
>> >X-cryst-bbk-ac-uk-MailScanner-Information: Please contact CCSG more 
information 
>> (http://www.cryst.bbk.ac.uk/CCSG/)
>> >X-cryst-bbk-ac-uk-MailScanner: Found to be clean
>> >X-cryst-bbk-ac-uk-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin 
(score=-3.906, 
>> required 9, BAYES_00 -4.90, FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS 0.99)
>> >X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at stat.math.ethz.ch
>> >Subject: [BioC] metadata - annotation package changes
>> >X-BeenThere: bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>> >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.6
>> >List-Id: The Bioconductor Project Mailing List 
<bioconductor.stat.math.ethz.ch>
>> >List-Unsubscribe: <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor>, 
>> <mailto:bioconductor-request at stat.math.ethz.ch?subject=unsubscribe>
>> >List-Archive: <https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/bioconductor>
>> >List-Post: <mailto:bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch>
>> >List-Help: <mailto:bioconductor-request at stat.math.ethz.ch?subject=help>
>> >List-Subscribe: <https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor>, 
>> <mailto:bioconductor-request at stat.math.ethz.ch?subject=subscribe>
>> >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>> >X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on  
>> pascal.dfci.harvard.edu
>> >X-Spam-Level: 
>> >X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham  
>> version=3.0.1
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >I guess my question is mainly directed to John Zhang and
>> >the other authors/maintainers of the annotation packages
>> >for Affymetrix chips.
>> >
>> >In the latest versions (1.8) of the moe430a and rae230a
>> >packages, the probe set ID-to-accession number mappings
>> >(ACCNUM) are different from those given in previous
>> >versions (1.5, 1.6, 1.7).
>> >
>> >Can someone please explain to me why there has been 
>> >a change?
>> >
>> >Regards,
>> >Maria.
>> >
>> >_______________________________________________
>> >Bioconductor mailing list
>> >Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>> >https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>> 
>> Jianhua Zhang
>> Department of Medical Oncology
>> Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
>> 44 Binney Street
>> Boston, MA 02115-6084
>> 

Jianhua Zhang
Department of Medical Oncology
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
44 Binney Street
Boston, MA 02115-6084