[BioC] Tiling array application
Kasper Daniel Hansen
k.hansen at biostat.ku.dk
Sat Apr 2 08:09:58 CEST 2005
On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 08:04:28PM -0500, James MacDonald wrote:
> It doesn't make any sense to use gcrma() if you don't have MM probes;
> the idea behind gcrma is to come up with a better measure of background
> than the MM measure itself. A modification of gcrma() that doesn't use
> MM probes is rma().
And if you are using a tiling array it does not seem to make sense (to
me at least) to use rma, since tiling arrays does not have the cpncept
of probesets.
But I do not know your particular array, so I may be wrong.
Kasper
> >>> Shinhan Shiu <shiu at uchicago.edu> 04/01/05 5:13 PM >>>
> We are trying to use GCRMA to adjust raw intensity values from tiling
> chip
> experiments (Arabidopsis). But the affy Arabidopsis tiling chip do not
> have
> mismatch probes and it seems the mismatch probe intensity is absolutely
> required in:
>
> bg.parameters.ns
>
> Where the mismatch probe intensities, mismatch probe affinity, and
> perfect
> match probe affinities are passed. I wonder how this function can be
> modified so only perfect match probe info is used. Thanks.
>
> Shinhan
>
>
> ********************************
> Shinhan Shiu
> Dept. of Ecology and Evolution
> University of Chicago
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
>
>
>
> **********************************************************
> Electronic Mail is not secure, may not be read every day, and should not be used for urgent or sensitive issues.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bioconductor mailing list
> Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
--
Kasper Daniel Hansen, Research Assistant
Department of Biostatistics, University of Copenhagen
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list