[BioC] MGU74A and MGU74Av2
Ben Bolstad
bolstad at stat.berkeley.edu
Fri Jun 20 21:10:17 MEST 2003
You have several options.
1. treat the MGU74a and MGU74av2 seperately, then try to figure out a
way to combine them.
2. Look at only the common probesets but in this case you will be
thowing away about 2500-3000 probesets (out of about 12600 total
probesets)
Option 1 is doable right now.
I will have an approach for option 2 in a couple of hours (a local
colleague has been bothering me about this for awhile).
thanks,
Ben
On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 12:47, David O. Nelson wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-06-20 at 11:24, Yongde Bao wrote:
> > David:
> >
> > Can you tell us how you dealt with the masked genes in MG 74A with rma?
> >
>
> I didn't. As I understand RMA (please correct me if I'm wrong here), the
> default approach is to use Ben Bolstad's quantile normalization followed
> by a robust fit of an additive model (y ~ array + probe) to each probe
> set separately.
>
> So, if you confine your attention to one chip type for your arrays, the
> normalization should go thru OK, and the fact that a particular probe
> set is spectacularly bad in predicting expression levels doesn't affect
> the expression estimates for other probe sets.
>
> Is that line of reasoning bogus?
>
> dave
>
>
> > Thanks, Yongde Bao
--
Ben Bolstad <bolstad at stat.berkeley.edu>
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list