[BioC] Testing for significant genes with RMA
Naomi Altman
naomi at stat.psu.edu
Fri Dec 19 16:20:59 MET 2003
Eric,
If I understand your question, it doesn't matter. (y-m)-(x-m)=y-x.
--Naomi
At 10:00 AM 12/19/2003, Eric wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Which would be more appropriate to use as the initial data for a 'per gene
>parametric test', the output of justRMA or the output of justRMA normalized
>to the mean of a control group (log of fold change)?
>
>
>Eric Blalock, PhD
>Dept Pharmacology, UKMC
>859 323-8033
>
>STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
>
>The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are confidential
>and are intended solely for addressee. The information may also be legally
>privileged. This transmission is sent in trust, for the sole purpose of
>delivery to the intended recipient. If you have received this transmission
>in error, any use, reproduction or dissemination of this transmission is
>strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please
>immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail or at (859) 323-8033 and
>delete this message and its attachments, if any.
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
>_______________________________________________
>Bioconductor mailing list
>Bioconductor at stat.math.ethz.ch
>https://www.stat.math.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioconductor
Naomi S. Altman 814-865-3791 (voice)
Associate Professor
Bioinformatics Consulting Center
Dept. of Statistics 814-863-7114 (fax)
Penn State University 814-865-1348 (Statistics)
University Park, PA 16802-2111
More information about the Bioconductor
mailing list