[Bioc-devel] surfaltr build on Bioc 3.17 error advice
Hervé Pagès
hp@ge@@on@g|thub @end|ng |rom gm@||@com
Tue Mar 21 21:50:06 CET 2023
On 21/03/2023 12:48, Pooja Gangras wrote:
> Hi Herve,
>
> Thank you for the quick response.
>
> So what surprises me is that msa was compiling and building just fine
> on the devel branch until now.
As I said, the switch from C++14 to C++17 happened not too long ago in
the devel version of R. And since we recently updated R on the BioC 3.17
builders to the most recent R devel, that switch is now reflected on the
3.17 builds.
> And hence so was surfaltr, without any errors. There was a warning in
> surfaltr which one can see on the 3.16 release, I had fixed it in the
> devel branch. For some reason I was not able to push changes to the
> existing 3.16 release branch.
That's a separate issue but if you provide more details about how you
tried to do this and what happened, maybe someone on this list will be
able to help.
>
> I will go ahead and contact the maintainer for msa but hoping that it
> will fix itself before release because it was just fine until yesterday.
Unfortunately it won't fix itself.
H.
>
> Thanks,
> Pooja
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023, 2:43 PM Hervé Pagès <hpages.on.github using gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> Hi Pooja,
>
> Generally speaking there are 3 things you can do when a dep breaks
> your
> package:
>
> 1. Consider getting rid of that dep.
>
> 2. Contact the author/maintainers of the dep to let them know
> about the
> problem. If you can suggest a fix (e.g. by sending a PR on GitHub),
> that's even better, as I'm sure it will help get the issue
> resolved more
> quickly.
>
> 3. Do nothing and hope that the dep will get fixed in time for the
> 3.17
> release (scheduled for end of April, see our release schedule here
> https://bioconductor.org/developers/release-schedule/ for the
> details).
> But that's risky ;-)
>
> In the case of msa's compilation error, it seems to be due to the R
> developers switching to the C++17 compiler by default for C++ package
> code in recent version of R devel (4.3 series). This is documented in
> the R devel NEWS file here:
> https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/NEWS.html
>
> Note that BioC 3.16 is based on R 4.2 which uses the C++14
> compiler by
> default for C++ package code. Therefore, in BioC 3.16, msa
> compiles fine
> on all platforms:
> https://bioconductor.org/checkResults/3.16/bioc-LATEST/msa/
>
> So one option for the msa folks is to stick to the C++14 compiler by
> adding C++14 to they 'SystemRequirements' field. Although I don't
> know
> how that would play with Rcpp which gets compiled with the C++17
> compiler, and which they depend on. So maybe that's a little bit
> risky?
> Maybe something to check with the Rcpp experts.
>
> Best,
>
> H.
>
> On 21/03/2023 09:18, Pooja Gangras wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I got an email yesterday alerting me of the error in the build
> in the new
> > BioC release. Upon looking into the error further I found out
> that the
> > error is occurring because a dependency 'msa' package is not
> being built in
> > the new release likely due to some issues with the C++ compiler
> (just
> > guessing here).
> >
> > Can you please advice on next steps? Is there anything I need to
> do here?
> >
> > Thanks for your help,
> > Pooja
> >
> > [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Bioc-devel using r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
> --
> Hervé Pagès
>
> Bioconductor Core Team
> hpages.on.github using gmail.com
>
--
Hervé Pagès
Bioconductor Core Team
hpages.on.github using gmail.com
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
More information about the Bioc-devel
mailing list